F A N
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 18,847
- 6,013
It’s incredibly irresponsible to project Bluegar to continue to perform at that level considering that he is a career 3rd line 4th line guy. Also depth, you can use Lindholm as a 1/2/3 C if needed but if we need Bluegar to fill the 1/2C hole we are f***ed.
I'm confused. We're talking about Blueger centering the third line between Garland and Joshua. Why is it irresponsible to project Blueger to continue centering the 3rd line?
I agree with Lindholm being a target because of his ability to play C. I'm just saying that the intention was for Lindholm to fill a top 6 winger spot because Blueger/Garland/Joshua was playing so well as the team's 3rd line. I don't think management's thinking was different from what we were thinking here at the time of the trade.