biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 26,343
- 11,438
I'll go with San Jose, Anaheim, and New Jersey.
It's tempting to go with Chicago for obvious reasons, but i don't necessarily think that a strong Chicago isn't a good thing for the league as a whole. So i could probably live with it, even though it's annoying to envision them basically jumping right from the Kane+Toews years to bottom out for a few years only to be immediately reloaded with Bedard and Celebrini.
I would've had Arizona on the list since it'd be a waste to have him playing in a college rink for a largely unserious franchise run by a deeply unserious owner. But i wouldn't be that mad about Utah getting a shiny new "franchise player" to go with their big move. Create some extra buzz and excitement.
It's tempting to go with Chicago for obvious reasons, but i don't necessarily think that a strong Chicago isn't a good thing for the league as a whole. So i could probably live with it, even though it's annoying to envision them basically jumping right from the Kane+Toews years to bottom out for a few years only to be immediately reloaded with Bedard and Celebrini.
I would've had Arizona on the list since it'd be a waste to have him playing in a college rink for a largely unserious franchise run by a deeply unserious owner. But i wouldn't be that mad about Utah getting a shiny new "franchise player" to go with their big move. Create some extra buzz and excitement.