IslandersGER
Registered User
yes, I had a second thought about it, but I still think he misunderstood me, maybe deliberatelyHe's talking about the NY in the logo I think.
yes, I had a second thought about it, but I still think he misunderstood me, maybe deliberatelyHe's talking about the NY in the logo I think.
It was first used as a Stadium Series jersey, which was then tweaked for an alternate jersey.what? ok I was not a fan since 1972 but researching the internet I read this
New York Islanders 1972-73 - The (unofficial) NHL Uniform Database
View attachment 825511
hm, you said "it is IN the original logo" - but come on man, you know I mean the Barclays jerseys do ONLY sport this NY sign. Everybody knows it is "in" the original, so it's needless to say it
I’m still surprised that not once during the 50th Anniversary celebration did they break out these jersey. Missed opportunity.what? ok I was not a fan since 1972 but researching the internet I read this
New York Islanders 1972-73 - The (unofficial) NHL Uniform Database
View attachment 825511
hm, you said "it is IN the original logo" - but come on man, you know I mean the Barclays jerseys do ONLY sport this NY sign. Everybody knows it is "in" the original, so it's needless to say it
They seem to play well in the Pilgrims, although they look comically bad.Is the alternate these pilgrim lookin things? If so, they’re an abomination and should all be burned.