Kaners Bald Spot
Registered User
Which forward do you expose?
There are pros and cons to both, that we all know and have been discussed ad nauseam.
There are pros and cons to both, that we all know and have been discussed ad nauseam.
I hope they can trade Strome, but they might have missed their chances last fall and at the TDL.Nylander plays fine in the bottome six if he has to. His issue is making good decisions in the o zone. He's good at skating the puck out of the dzone. As disappointing as it would be if he ends up a bottom sixer, he would be fine. Strome has to play in the top six. If you can't play him in the top six, might as well move on.
Rather trade him than expose him though.
7-3-1Um....neither?
Why the f*** would either get exposed?
Gaudette over Strome and Nylander lmao7-3-1
Kane, Toews, Cat, Borgstrom, Gaudette, Hagel
Keith, Murphy, Zadorov
Lankinen
That leaves either Strome or Nylander exposed.
They could take the gamble and try to sneak Borgstrom through. idk if they'd get away with it.
Expose Strome and hope they do us a favor and take him off our hands. Zero interest in protecting Strome, and not much interest in protecting Nylander but not sure we have anyone better to protect.
Not even sure Seattle would take Gaudette if he were exposed but if they did then whatever, no huge loss. This team needs top end talent more than it does middle and bottom sixers.
Love the, I heard Gaudette had a good game and then instantly created this
He has 4 points in 3 games, he's obviously playing well and everyone said he looks dangerous.Haha, I didn't even realize that's how it went down because I stayed off this place yesterday.
Absolutely classic KBS overreaction.
He has 4 points in 3 games, he's obviously playing well and everyone said he looks dangerous.
Idk how much more you have to see from Gaudette to know if he's worth protecting.