Panthaz89
Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
I really don't mind being no.3 but the Devils if all things should be one of the teams ahead of us. Chicago and the Ducks have hardly any big NHL players under 23.
Yeah, I’m starting to get burnt on it tooThe athletic is becoming kind of a joke
It's the childish "omg Bedard" conversation ender.I really don't mind being no.3 but the Devils if all things should be one of the teams ahead of us. Chicago and the Ducks have hardly any big NHL players under 23.
Yeah I am not sold on him either but it would be fun to finally have a first year player putting up Crosby, Ovi, Mcdavid numbers.I don't wish ill on the kid but it'd amuse me if his lack of size and great skating means he's a better Cole Caulfield vice a 'generational' talent
I don't wish ill on the kid but it'd amuse me if his lack of size and great skating means he's a better Cole Caulfield vice a 'generational' talent
Pronman published his top under-23 today. Theres a lot going on in that list lol. Anyhow. We got 12 in the top 165. Thats 2.33 times the "average" of about 5 per team.
I take Pronman's projections on prospects as seriously as I would Jim Cramer's investment advice.We are going to need some crow farms to provide us enough crow for people to eat when Savoie ends up a high end top 6 player.
"Mad Hockey"I take Pronman's projections on prospects as seriously as I would Jim Cramer's investment advice.
I take those seriously as well, but in the sense that I immediately expect the opposite of what he says to happen.I take Pronman's projections on prospects as seriously as I would Jim Cramer's investment advice.
How though? There is really no reason to have Levi ranked higher than he is. Not yet anyways. I am really worried about what this organization is going to do to our best hope in net.Levi at 12 is laughable and kills any credibility that list could have.
yeah wish they had drafted 2 highly regarded goalies the past 2 drafts....oh wait they didHow though? There is really no reason to have Levi ranked higher than he is. Not yet anyways. I am really worried about what this organization is going to do to our best hope in net.
What other goaltender are you referring to? Certainly not portillo.yeah wish they had drafted 2 highly regarded goalies the past 2 drafts....oh wait they did
You seem to think that's an insult, when either of them would probably agree -- they're only here for entertainment purposes. Neither proclaim to be anything more than that, just discussion fodder.I take Pronman's projections on prospects as seriously as I would Jim Cramer's investment advice.
The two things that make me really scratch my head are him having Cooley and Nemec so low, and Luke Hughes so high. I definitely disagree on those.We couldn't stay #1 forever but I don't think Bedard should propel the Blackhawks that far alone.
The writer is clearly a joke. He is off on several levels. The Athletic should be embarrassed by this, but they are not. All they want is content to push out there, so they let these stupid kids write articles even though they are wrong about much of what they write and the rest is just repeating what they've read elsewhere.I'm looking through them now, and the first glaring thing that jumps out to me:
JJP has his shot ranked as "NHL elite", Cozens is "Above NHL Average" and Quinn.....doesn't have his shot ranked.
Quinn's shot is easily the best of the 3......and I feel like Cozens' is better than JJP.
The writer is clearly a joke. He is off on several levels. The Athletic should be embarrassed by this, but they are not. All they want is content to push out there, so they let these stupid kids write articles even though they are wrong about much of what they write and the rest is just repeating what they've read elsewhere.