senseimike
Registered User
- Dec 6, 2015
- 95
- 33
If $$ was not an issue, could the Sens theoretically bury Korpi in the AHL so it doesn't count against the cap and then sign a new goalie?
All but 1.1 million counts against the cap while burried. so he would still be almost 3M against the cap.If $$ was not an issue, could the Sens theoretically bury Korpi in the AHL so it doesn't count against the cap and then sign a new goalie?
1.2 million of cap is buried, goes up 50k a year I think. Rest is cap so 2.8 millionIf $$ was not an issue, could the Sens theoretically bury Korpi in the AHL so it doesn't count against the cap and then sign a new goalie?
Geez...Guess we're stuck with the guy. Thx for the intel!All but 1.1 million counts against the cap while burried. so he would still be almost 3M against the cap.
I wonder whether people think Staois explored trading Korpisalo already around the deadline and there wasn’t much interest?
Perhaps this is why he says Korpisalo's numbers will improve?
Time for rampant speculation and theories. LOL.
Yes, and that would also make sense with Staois' “no buyout” statements in the interview. If teams thought the Senators would buy out Korpisalo and had any interest in him (yes, strange concept), then they’d just wait until he’s bought out.It would shock me if he didn't listen on Korpisalo.
Apparently the trade didn't get done because he wasn't sure which team the tumbleweed he heard.from was GM of..