I will easily give up a 1st but he’s not worth two 1st round picks at all .#13 + conditional 2025 1st + Riley Heidt
Have no idea if Philly plans on re-signing him though.
Think those asks are too much. Maybe not Rossi but an extension would have to be worked out for Konecny1 for 1 type for Rossi or Faber + cap dump. Or Walstedt + pick + cap dump.
Price is high cause personally I’d re-sign him, he’s a true Flyer and should be here for long long time
Rentals routinely get moved for a first plus with top guys like to getting a young roster player as well. Minnie has the assets to get it done with two pieces but he absolutely commands that kind of value.I will easily give up a 1st but he’s not worth two 1st round picks at all .
No he wouldn’t. Fiala who wasn’t a rental got a 1st and b prospect at that time. He’s not better than fiala. Wild aren’t giving up any top prospects in any trade. Our gm hasn’t even given up a 1st ever. They can just sign a winger for 1-2 years which is the planRentals routinely get moved for a first plus with top guys like to getting a young roster player as well. Minnie has the assets to get it done with two pieces but he absolutely commands that kind of value.
Have you ever gotten a single thing right? Fiala wasn’t a rental?No he wouldn’t. Fiala who wasn’t a rental got a 1st and b prospect at that time. He’s not better than fiala. Wild aren’t giving up any top prospects in any trade. Our gm hasn’t even given up a 1st ever. They can just sign a winger for 1-2 years which is the plan
At one yr left, he will get a 2st+ but not 2 1st outright. Onr could be s 2,nd to 1st t if team won cupStart with 2 #1's and a player. You asked.
If you ask for a player like Yurov, you likely dont get a 1st as eell.If Yurov isn’t on the table, then you’re not in the game on Konecny. The Flyers have to sell to fans trading their most important and popular player after his best season. The return is going to include another team’s most important asset(s). If you’re unwilling to go there, then it’s a hard stop. So it’s not the Flyers trying again, it’s you guys who asked.
That’s a horrible deal for MN#13 + conditional 2025 1st + Riley Heidt
Have no idea if Philly plans on re-signing him though.
I’m interested#13 + conditional 2025 1st + Riley Heidt
Have no idea if Philly plans on re-signing him though.
There’s a cost to getting a player for an entire year. That’s not a rental. You’re not willing to meet it, and that’s fine. I don’t think the two teams are good trading partners because they have the same needs.If you ask for a player like Yurov, you likely dont get a 1st as eell.
Hes s rental
Meier get a 1st and a high prospect. He w sd sn RFA
Same with LA signing Fuska after trade their 1st and top prospect
Both had an idea on resigning.
Vanpc got contract 1st+ b prospect for horvat
It's just basically the Fiala deal + the middle part.That’s a horrible deal for MN
Fiala deal was 19 + a former 2nd round pick many valued as a mid-late first. I don’t see the reason to throw Heidt in.It's just basically the Fiala deal + the middle part.
No matter what, Yurov isn’t getting traded by wild. So noIf you ask for a player like Yurov, you likely dont get a 1st as eell.
Hes s rental
Meier get a 1st and a high prospect. He w sd sn RFA
Same with LA signing Fuska after trade their 1st and top prospect
Both had an idea on resigning.
Vanpc got contract 1st+ b prospect for horvat
A player with a year left is literally considered to be a rental in any league. You can’t say a player with year left isn’t a rental as that would be a lieThere’s a cost to getting a player for an entire year. That’s not a rental. You’re not willing to meet it, and that’s fine. I don’t think the two teams are good trading partners because they have the same needs.
Did I say that? Re-read what I said. I said he was an rfa, butHave you ever gotten a single thing right? Fiala wasn’t a rental?
He was a rental , he needed a deal. He had no contract. UFA or RFA makes no difference to the acquiring team. They had to pay him and he had to agree to stay.Did I say that? Re-read what I said. I said he was an rfa, but
A player that you trade for during the season after having had evaluated your roster needs knowing he is likely to walk is a rental. If you trade for a player during the offseason, it’s by and large with the idea that they can fit long term.No matter what, Yurov isn’t getting traded by wild. So no
A player with a year left is literally considered to be a rental in any league. You can’t say a player with year left isn’t a rental as that would be a lie
That’s so factually incorrect, and lie also. Teams trade for players in the offseason with a year left all the time especially contenders knowing it could or will be 1year rental.A player that you trade for during the season after having had evaluated your roster needs knowing he is likely to walk is a rental. If you trade for a player during the offseason, it’s by and large with the idea that they can fit long term.
I think he's trying to work around when the other guy said no Russian yurov could approximate the stone deal or kusneysov the fiala deal but I doubt anyone outside of Minnesota has a grasp on thier pool well enough to find value that fits what both teams would find interestingFiala deal was 19 + a former 2nd round pick many valued as a mid-late first. I don’t see the reason to throw Heidt in.
For a guy who averages in points equals Slaf's this year? No thanks.For The Habs, assuming he'd resign, I'd give up 2 1sts ( WPG and some combo of the HABS/CGY/FLA pick in 2025) + Harris/Struble + Mesar
A player that you trade for during the season after having had evaluated your roster needs knowing he is likely to walk is a rental. If you trade for a player during the offseason, it’s by and large with the idea that they can fit long term.
That’s so factually incorrect, and lie also. Teams trade for players in the offseason with a year left all the time especially contenders knowing it could or will be 1year rental.