Gabe Kupari
Registered User
I don’t mind that strategy at all. Make the transition as smooth as possible for Chibrikov, Kuzmin and Zhilkin.
Zhilkin is more Canadian now lol
I don’t mind that strategy at all. Make the transition as smooth as possible for Chibrikov, Kuzmin and Zhilkin.
Zhilkin is more Canadian now lol
I guess where I'm confused is how Kopabianco was considered to have more upside that RHD 6'5 Kovacevic... or Kuhlman better than Harkins. Stuff like that.Understandably frustrating, but a core tenant of a draft and develop team is to develop players that are better than the people that are already on the NHL roster. That is equal parts on the player, the scouts, the coaches, and the GM. The only players that have developed to a degree better than the players that are already on the team are on the fringes, or are hamstrung by cap hits.
God that back end is a f***ing mess for contracts, and they need to address that this off season. They need to get rid of at least one vet and two waiver eligible players. You can't keep all of Stanley, Heinola, and Chisholm.
Yea half the posters are arrogance and that's how the Hfboard forum works
Never admit you are wrong about the projection of a player if you are proven wrong later
If we can let Stanley take off, that’s would just leave Heiny and Chisholm to deke it out for a spot..Understandably frustrating, but a core tenant of a draft and develop team is to develop players that are better than the people that are already on the NHL roster. That is equal parts on the player, the scouts, the coaches, and the GM. The only players that have developed to a degree better than the players that are already on the team are on the fringes, or are hamstrung by cap hits.
God that back end is a f***ing mess for contracts, and they need to address that this off season. They need to get rid of at least one vet and two waiver eligible players. You can't keep all of Stanley, Heinola, and Chisholm.