Series Talk: ECQF: Boston Bruins vs Toronto Maple Leafs (Series Tied 3-3)

What will be the outcome of this series?

  • Boston in 4

    Votes: 95 6.1%
  • Boston in 5

    Votes: 307 19.8%
  • Boston in 6

    Votes: 445 28.7%
  • Boston in 7

    Votes: 277 17.8%
  • Toronto in 4

    Votes: 20 1.3%
  • Toronto in 5

    Votes: 38 2.4%
  • Toronto in 6

    Votes: 188 12.1%
  • Toronto in 7

    Votes: 183 11.8%

  • Total voters
    1,553
Status
Not open for further replies.

Score8

Registered User
Apr 6, 2017
4,538
4,647
Ironically that series also had one of the core injured.



Matthews was pulled from the game before the third. So they all played together for 2 periods in 4 games.
Let go of the core . The sooner you do the sooner the leafs fix this train to nowhere.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,070
13,186
It very well might be. What have the Leafs - ever - shown that would warrant the benefit of the doubt at this point?
No it doesn't, at all. What occurred in one playoff season doesn't automatically apply to another.

You don't understand how a statistic works. Kind of embarrassing.

Anything anyone says can't apply because seasons are independent... so what are you asking?
 

PainForShane

formerly surfshop
Dec 24, 2019
2,539
2,990
Sure but is this series 3-1 if Nylander plays the first 3 games?

Blaming the core 4 for a series where they haven't played a full game together doesn't make any sense.

Leafs are built wrong. Too much money in forwards means you can't keep depth unless they're taking paycuts, which might and happen for a single year (ie Bertuzzi, Domi, ROR etc) but doesn't generally happen long term. It means you can't afford Luke Schenn on a very reasonable 2.75m multi-year deal and it means that yet again you'll be bargain hunting for a goalie in the summer. Obvi it's worse when ppl are injured but to pretend the problem is injuries to forwards (or the refs, which you claimed in a different thread) is embarrassing to read.

The Leafs are down 3-1 because they have a shit goalie, poor depth and have imploded to the point that Nylander has to tell Marner to stop crying. And this is after how many years of playoffs implosion?

100%. Well said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

Shanahanigans

Registered User
Jun 16, 2011
2,347
1,922
Marner and Matthews have both played 54 playoff games, Marner has 49 points and Matthews has 47. The Leafs also outscore teams by a margin of 2-1 when Marner is on the ice in the playoffs the last few years. I feel like because Marner is small, soft, and can seem "whiny", he catches the ire of Leafs fans and media that should be reserved for all of the core 4 for underperforming.
 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
25,422
14,660
Montreal, QC
?

Anything you say can't apply because seasons are independent... so what are you asking?

If you want to make an equivalence between the weight 'has this team shown a history of playoff success?' with 'they have never lost less than 7 in the first round' (which isn't even true? Didn't they lose to the Caps in 6?) you can go right ahead but don't expect anyone to take it seriously.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,070
13,186
If you want to make an equivalence between the weight 'has this team shown a history of playoff success?' with 'they have never lost less than 7 in the first round' (which isn't even true? Didn't they lose to the Caps in 6?) you can go right ahead but don't expect anyone to take it seriously.

Injuries to a core player have an impact whether you want to admit it or not.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,070
13,186
If anyone knows a series isn't over at 3-1, it's Boston.

They were literally talking the same trash right before choking a 3-1 lead last year.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ladyfan

Just Rude

"I'm listening to the *** song!!!"
Oct 15, 2005
4,675
3,489
Perhaps I'm harsh and a 5-13 home record in the playoffs is actually good.
It's f***ing inexcusable. Home ice is supposed to be an advantage. You literally play for it all year to try to get the matchups you want.

I don't get it.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,070
13,186
It's f***ing inexcusable. Hope ice is supposed to be an advantage. You literally play for it all year to try to get the matchups you want.

I don't get it.

Leafs loyalty to Keefe is ridiculous. Edmonton fired 3 coaches in Keefe's tenure so far. They were tied with San Jose before Woodcroft was fired.

Keefe however gets unlimited chances and we'll never know if another coach would have made of a difference. There's a chance that Keefe could have been the problem as other teams, such as Edmonton this season, improved with the same players under a different coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just Rude
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad