Why has the league not retired #27 for Lemieux?

Breakfast of Champs

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,021
3,045
Both Crosby and Lafleur have had their Jersey numbers retired league wide, but there is the glaring omission of Lemieux. I am sort of Confused by this as he was arguably the best of the 3 during his Q career.

Is there something else going on here I am unaware of? I understand its not the same # he wore or was famous for in the NHL, but the same can be said for Lafleur.
 

Breakfast of Champs

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,021
3,045
Lemieux wore #66 (not #27) while playing in the Q and I agree, his number should be retired throughout the league.
Yes you're right it was pre Q days Lemieux was #27 and then he switched, makes it even weirder seeing as it's a number almost nobody will wear
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Austria vs Finland
    Austria vs Finland
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $1,377.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Sweden vs Kazakhstan
    Sweden vs Kazakhstan
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $1,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins
    New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $1,010.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Las Palmas vs Real Betis
    Las Palmas vs Real Betis
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $100.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • France vs USA
    France vs USA
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad