48-47 Chito is honestly one of the worst scorecards I have ever seen. Disgusting. Nothing supports that score.Am I the only one who didn't think the 48-47 Chito was that bad? Especially compared to some of the score cards we've been getting lately. I don't think he won the fight by any means but those last 3 rounds didn't have a clear winner. Sandhagen did have more control but hard to argue that either did more damage. I certainly didn't think it was as bad as the commentary team seemed to think.
Merab vs. Sandhagen works for me. That seems like the fight to make since Merab isn't fighting Aljo.
No idea what's up with O'Malley. I do know there's zero chance they're putting him in there with Merab.
Am I the only one who didn't think the 48-47 Chito was that bad? Especially compared to some of the score cards we've been getting lately. I don't think he won the fight by any means but those last 3 rounds didn't have a clear winner. Sandhagen did have more control but hard to argue that either did more damage. I certainly didn't think it was as bad as the commentary team seemed to think.
I think that is a huge exaggeration, if this is one of the worst scorecards youve seen then you need to watch more fights. Again, I absolutely don't think Chito won but when there's not a ton of damage being landed on either side it's hard to have such strong opinions on the scorecards. I think the scorecard is wrong, but I don't think it's as bad as everyone's making it out to be.48-47 Chito is honestly one of the worst scorecards I have ever seen. Disgusting. Nothing supports that score.
Completely disagree. I think it has more to do with the dominance in the first 2 rounds, making the rest seem competitive in comparison. A total illusion that sways the incompetent mind.I think that is a huge exaggeration, if this is one of the worst scorecards youve seen then you need to watch more fights. Again, I absolutely don't think Chito won but when there's not a ton of damage being landed on either side it's hard to have such strong opinions on the scorecards. I think the scorecard is wrong, but I don't think it's as bad as everyone's making it out to be.
You clearly have very strong opinions/like to exaggerate and seemingly aren't able to have a normal conversation without blowing things out of proportion. So I won't pry anymore and just simply disagree. Chito clearly lost the fight however, the last 3 rounds weren't nearly dominant or decisive enough to make this one of the worst scorecards in recent memory.Completely disagree. I think it has more to do with the dominance in the first 2 rounds, making the rest seem competitive in comparison. A total illusion that sways the incompetent mind.
I'll wait for a single human being to come close to justifying 3 rounds to Vera. The numbers weren't even remotely close, not to mention the takedowns. I have been watching this sport obsessively for a long time and that scorecard is despicable.
Athletic commissions are terrible.Regardless of how bad the scorecard is, the guy with the dissenting scorecard seems to only have a few fights that he's even judged in the mma decision database. Why are these guys judging big UFC fights? Makes no sense.
Indeed it wasYeah, as long as it was the last three rounds I don't hate it as much as most. People seem to be outraged at every scorecard they don't like lately.
I wasn't scoring too closely, though.