This is some of the stupidest shit I've ever read.
Howden's ice time dropped as his play did and the Rangers got other options. He played 10:18 at even-strength in his last season under Quinn.
Kravtsov had been in Hartford for 39 games before leaving for first time. He probably hadn't seen Quinn in months. Then he came back (while Quinn was coach) and, yes, was used sparingly. The Rangers were vaguely in a playoff race and he unfortunately wasn't very good. He did get some opportunity. He played 40 minutes on Panarin's opposite wing. The Rangers went scoreless and were outshot heavily in those 40 minutes (unusual for 2020/21 Panarin). The second time he left, Gallant was the coach.
You seem to be equating Fox's development with strictly his point production.
Gallant was powerless to stop Strome and Panarin, lol. Maybe he didn't want to because both of their top two most productive seasons (without comparison) were the two seasons they were together under Quinn.
Quinn liked Lemieux as the net-front on PP2. I didn't like him there, but putting a big, physical guy there was hardly an unheard of strategy for NHL coaches.
In Quinn's three seasons in New York, Filip Chytil played 215:43 on the powerplay. He had 10 powerplay points. Of the 302 players in the league with at least that much powerplay time, 9 of them had fewer points than Chytil. Oh and by the way, in Chytil's 76 games without Quinn as his coach, he has 1 powerplay point. Ranger fans seem to really take issue with ice time being tied to production.
There are fair criticisms of Quinn as a coach. The Rangers came out flat in way too many important games under him, and that wasn't the case under Gallant this year.
But most of Ranger fans' criticism I would think is parody if I didn't know better. His main problem is that Kakko and Lafreniere weren't as good off the bat as we thought they would be. He got the blame for that. Many Ranger fans think the answer when a player is struggling with minimal ice time is to give them more ice time. That's helps them develop in Eastside Hockey Manager. I don't think many of those that think that watch a lot of other teams, because I don't see a lot of NHL coaches doing that. You should go back and read the thread on the Rangers board about Gallant's hiring. The expectations were not based in reality. He's going to give Lafreniere and Kakko consistent top-six and PP1 minutes. Chytil will finally breakout. Kravtsov will claim a regular spot. Even Julien Gauthier will take a step forward. Classic comedy.
Chytil's ice time dropped. Lafreniere got another six seconds per game. Those two are better players than they started the year, as they should be at their age. Kakko did jump up more than a minute. Results were uneven and he was scratched in an elimination game. Gallant cut Kravtsov and he bolted. I'm not convinced Gauthier wouldn't clear waivers at this point.
So draw your own conclusions.