RD Carter Yakemchuk - Calgary Hitmen, WHL (2024 Draft)

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
25,182
30,121
Seems to me that Yakemchuk has some of the same issues that David Jiricek has. In fact, I think he has some of the same issues that Rodwin Dionicio has. He may be better than both but if he has those same issues then he'll have a lot of work to do to make the NHL...let alone be a star.

Yakemchuk has the exact same issue (it's really one thing) as David Jiricek. Both struggle to get going backwards defending the rush. They get walked.

But those are NHLers all day, the question is just whether they're going to be more offensive specialists or whether they can be trusted in all situations. Sometimes you have to take a risk with a prospect like that to get the high upside. I personally think the upside with those two is much higher than your guy Silayev, who I think is going to be a defensive specialist and not an all situations player.

You might be right, though Burns has really lost a step in the last year. I would hope Yakemchuk's skating & explosiveness improve as he matures. He'll never be a super agile guy, but with his range and top speed I think he'll be okay.


Probably lol.

Burns right now is very slow in all directions, Yakemchuk is obviously faster in most ways, it's just a question of those slow first steps back.

I don't see the Burns, Bfuglyien, or Seabrook comps at all. Burns and Byfuglien were by no means perfect players when they was younger, and were shuttled between forward and D trying to find where they were most effective, but both were absolutely huge, and incredibly strong. Yakemchuk seems to be relatively big and strong, but nothing like those two.

Yakemchuk is huge and strong though. He's not quite as tall as Burns or thick as Buff but he looks bigger and stronger than most 6'3 guys. We'll see where he measures up. I think his comp as Burns/Buff is about as far off as it is on the other end comparing him to Trouba/Schneider. He really is special in his physical strength and his ability to protect the puck with his reach and frame.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
34,051
30,755
I don't see the Burns, Bfuglyien, or Seabrook comps at all. Burns and Byfuglien were by no means perfect players when they was younger, and were shuttled between forward and D trying to find where they were most effective, but both were absolutely huge, and incredibly strong. Yakemchuk seems to be relatively big and strong, but nothing like those two.
As mentioned above, Seabrook was a good defensive guy who ended up adding some offense to his game before it all went away.
Byfuglien was huge (too big lol) but Burns was listed at 6'4 183 when he was drafted, Yakemchuk is 6'3 201.


I wouldn't be shocked to see Yakemchuk end up being listed at 6'4 220-225. He's got a pretty big frame.

Edit: Jesus this kid has grown. He was 5'9 155 when he was drafted into the WHL.https://chl.ca/whl-hitmen/get-to-know-carter-yakemchuk/#:~:text=The%205'9%E2%80%B3146%2D,be%20a%20potential%20powerplay%20quarterback.
 
Last edited:

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
9,444
5,103
Visit site
Yakemchuk has the exact same issue (it's really one thing) as David Jiricek. Both struggle to get going backwards defending the rush. They get walked.

But those are NHLers all day, the question is just whether they're going to be more offensive specialists or whether they can be trusted in all situations. Sometimes you have to take a risk with a prospect like that to get the high upside. I personally think the upside with those two is much higher than your guy Silayev, who I think is going to be a defensive specialist and not an all situations player.
I agree that Yakemchuk has lots of upside but the risk factor is just as high. The issue (and I think there are one or two others) that you mentioned is pretty important in determining whether a guy will be an NHL regular or an AHL all-star. And when I watch Yakemchuk and Dionicio I see similar dangling and stick work. And I wonder with both of them how much of that will translate to the NHL...just a fraction is my impression. Everyone after Celebrini has issues so I'm not sure where I'd slot Yakemchuk but I don't think it would be top 5.

As for Silayev, as a Ducks fan he is exactly what this team needs to add into the organization. They have tons of offensive D but have no one who excels on the defensive side. He may not have 3OA value to other teams but for the Ducks I think he does. His floor is probably 2nd pairing defensive anchor (much more than a defensive specialist IMO...his skating is just too good). If he even develops decent offensive skills he's a top pairing guy. Again, my focus on him at 3OA is strictly about how he'd fits so perfectly for the Ducks.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,849
23,697
East Coast
Byfuglien was huge (too big lol) but Burns was listed at 6'4 183 when he was drafted, Yakemchuk is 6'3 201.


I wouldn't be shocked to see Yakemchuk end up being listed at 6'4 220-225. He's got a pretty big frame.

Edit: Jesus this kid has grown. He was 5'9 155 when he was drafted into the WHL.https://chl.ca/whl-hitmen/get-to-know-carter-yakemchuk/#:~:text=The%205'9%E2%80%B3146%2D,be%20a%20potential%20powerplay%20quarterback.
W kids are all drafted in their 14 years old season with another year before they are eligible for the W. Their draft sizes are always much smaller than the O or Q where they are drafted in their 15 year old season and jump straight in. The growth looks much larger than other leagues, because they are given a full extra year when boys grow the largest amount.

Kids are generally growing a ton between 14 and 15, the difference between the 2 leagues form draft to rookie year is substantial, as it's 3 vs 15 months

He was 6'2 185 in his rookie season in Calgary

He's going to be a big boy, likely playing around 6'3 210ish I'd guess
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
34,051
30,755
W kids are all drafted in their 14 years old season with another year before they are eligible for the W. Their draft sizes are always much smaller than the O or Q where they are drafted in their 15 year old season and jump straight in. The growth looks much larger than other leagues, because they are given a full extra year when boys grow the largest amount.

Kids are generally growing a ton between 14 and 15, the difference between the 2 leagues form draft to rookie year is substantial, as it's 3 vs 15 months

He was 6'2 185 in his rookie season in Calgary

He's going to be a big boy, likely playing around 6'3 210ish I'd guess
Yea I'm aware, that's still half a foot and ~50 lbs in pretty short order! It would make help explain why his agility is relatively poor - he's grown a ton in the last handful of years. It may take a few more years for him to fully settle into his frame.
 

Faceboner

Registered User
Jan 6, 2022
1,712
1,201
Definitely a high reward anywhere in the 6-12 range physical force with wheels and puck skills also a scoring touch wouldn't be surprised to see Utah take a swing on him
 

Doublechin

Registered User
Jun 23, 2013
3,109
1,286
Definitely a high reward anywhere in the 6-12 range physical force with wheels and puck skills also a scoring touch wouldn't be surprised to see Utah take a swing on him
I wouldn't be surprised that he's end up being the top D on some lists, the main knocks on him and Levshunov are their IQ but I see more offense potentially from Yak and more physical play and for some teams that might give him an edge as the top RD
 

JT3

Registered User
May 27, 2013
998
1,592
I’ve been saying all year that he’s a D version of Corey Perry. Haha.
I've said the same thing! I think he's a better skater than Corey, but the rattiness, physicality, the dangles on a big frame are so reminiscent of Perry. He's a much better skater than Perry in my opinion though, and I don't share the same concerns with his skating some people have. He's very much an average skater but he gets around just fine.

If you want to swing on upside Yakemchuk is the guy for me, he's pretty nearly the whole package and if he goes to a franchise with a strong development team that can help him refine a few things in his game (namely gap control/d coverage/decision making) he will be a star.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sens in Process

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,895
47,350
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
I've said the same thing! I think he's a better skater than Corey, but the rattiness, physicality, the dangles on a big frame are so reminiscent of Perry. He's a much better skater than Perry in my opinion though, and I don't share the same concerns with his skating some people have. He's very much an average skater but he gets around just fine.

If you want to swing on upside Yakemchuk is the guy for me, he's pretty nearly the whole package and if he goes to a franchise with a strong development team that can help him refine a few things in his game (namely gap control/d coverage/decision making) he will be a star.

I was thinking about his janky skating. He has the feet to easily gain the blueline, beat forwards and get behind them. He has the feet to escape pressure as well as any defender in the draft. And he has the length and aggression to gap up really effectively on oncoming forwards. His backward skating needs work and his pivots. His mechanics need work as his stride is ugly. And he doesn’t have elite separation speed. But does he need any of that to play his game? And is his game still extremely valuable without those elements?

If he can stop getting turnstyled (when he can’t challenge oncoming forwards and instead has to skate with them)I think teams can live with the rest. And happily.

He’s got great feet but a bad stride and some mechanical issues. There’s some work to be done but there’s so much upside apart from all that.
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,121
2,449
Big fan of this player and would be happy if the Flames took him at #9 depending on who's still available. I dunno if he'd be at the top of my list for the defenders ranking but he's my favourite. A big hit or one big shot can change a game fast.
The Flames are gonna have a big decision to make if he and Iginla are both there. Or should I say, the media and fans are gonna think they’ll have a big decision to make. I’d wager Conroy runs to the stage with the Yakemchuk pick and never thinks twice about it. You simply can’t take Iginla over Yakemchuk in Calgary. You’ll never hear the end of it.

The Flames are the exact reason I can’t see him dropping out of the Top 10. The only way, is if the Russian kid drops (over the Putin thing) and they take him. Otherwise they may never live the pick down.
 

Zirakzigil

Global Moderator
Jul 5, 2010
29,798
24,696
Canada
The Flames are gonna have a big decision to make if he and Iginla are both there. Or should I say, the media and fans are gonna think they’ll have a big decision to make. I’d wager Conroy runs to the stage with the Yakemchuk pick and never thinks twice about it. You simply can’t take Iginla over Yakemchuk in Calgary. You’ll never hear the end of it.

The Flames are the exact reason I can’t see him dropping out of the Top 10. The only way, is if the Russian kid drops (over the Putin thing) and they take him. Otherwise they may never live the pick down.
Flames picked up a lot of blueline prospects through trade. I think they would prefer an impact forward with their top pick. All depends on their internal rankings. Id be happy with either player.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad