Langway
In den Wolken
- Jul 7, 2006
- 32,521
- 9,248
Did Wilson get a penalty there at the end? Is that why he went straight to the locker room?
ok....if the power play is a shooting gallery of quality chances, does it still suck if it doesnt score?
Gallery of quality chances? Did we watch the same game? They had 6 PPs and maybe good chances on 2 of them.
Keep moving that flagpole.
ok....if the power play is a shooting gallery of quality chances, does it still suck if it doesnt score?
gotta be some kind of recordAll 8 goals at the same end......good Caps got that end twice
I don’t think I would call that a shooting gallery. Maybe 3-4 quality chances. With one being the should have goal from kuz which was sort of a broken play. The PP was given the perimeter by the preds and the generated most of their shots from the perimeter. Fortunately they have some good shooters that can score from there. But you can’t count on that. It was too predictable. Goalie was set on all the shot and they just didn’t feel dangerous.
It sucked tonight.I wouldnt call it a shooting gallery either. I would say it looked good. My question wasnt directly related to the game. Let me rephrase. Does the pp suck no matter what if they dont score?
gotta be some kind of record
I asked a question. I was just asking a basic question. Tonight? I saw 3 or 4 goals that should have gone in. The saves were all highlights on teh game i saw. The Caps had 13 pp shots in this game. Were they all cans of corn?
They had 6 PPs. 13 is just a little over 2 shots per PP. Is that supposed to be great?
Your premise is wrong. They did not have a "gallery of quality chances". You phrased it in that manner and set up your premise that way because you want to say you were right that this PP was magically going to get better when everyone returns.
ok....if the power play is a shooting gallery of quality chances, does it still suck if it doesnt score?
They had 6 PPs. 13 is just a little over 2 shots per PP. Is that supposed to be great?
Your premise is wrong. They did not have a "gallery of quality chances". You phrased it in that manner and set up your premise that way because you want to say you were right that this PP was magically going to get better when everyone returns.