vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,420
- 1,282
The KHL released the clubs´ rating after 2020-2021 season. It includes the clubs´ performace for the period of the last three seasons (2018-2019 to 2020-2021).
The rating is an instrument for the KHL Board of Directors how to objectively evaluate the clubs. The KHL BoD excluded Lada & Yugra for being at the bottom of the ranking. But, it does not mean your club is automatically excluded for being at the bottom of the ranking. The KHL BoD can take other criteria into account when deciding on exclusion. All potential new clubs are evaluated on the methodics of this ranking.
The rating has 9-10 criteria – standings (20%), standings value (20%), financing (10%), salary payment (5%), arena capacity & attendance (10%), technical reglement rules (10%), TV Index (10%), match-day revenues (10%), work with social media & media outlets (5%).
Standings
It is simply the result on ice, so standing after regular-season & playoffs. The most succesful teams getting more points.
Top: CSKA, Avangard, Ak Bars, SKA, Dynamo Msc
Bottom: Sochi, Amur, KRS, Minsk & Riga
Standings value
It is the connection between the financing spent on salaries & points in the standings. So, the club with average budget but better results on ice is at the top of the ranking.
Top: Barys, Jokerit, Avangard, CSKA, Torpedo
Bottom: Traktor, Riga, Metallurg, Amur, KRS
Financing
It shows us how the club is dependant on government & state corporations funding. Less public money in your budget, more points in the rating. Three clubs are fully private-financed, they are Jokerit, Severstal, KRS. All three having all available points (10)
Top: Jokerit, Severstal, KRS, Metallurg, Avto
Bottom: Ak Bars, Sochi, Vityaz, Barys, Avangard
Salary payment
It is about players´ salaries payments by clubs. If club pays on time, getting more points. Ten clubs have been on time with salaries payments for all three seasons.
Top: Avangard, Avto, Ak Bars, Jokerit, Loko, Metallurg, Neftekhimik, Severstal, SKA, CSKA
Bottom: Sibir, Torpedo, Barys, Sochi, Amur
Arena capacity & Attendance
The league takes the arena with 12 000 seats as ideal for criterion calculation, so getting full points. Lower capacity = less points. Attendance is taken from average occupancy, only 2018-19 a 2019-20 seasons due to pandemic.
Top: SKA, Spartak, Metallurg, Minsk, Avto
Bottom: Riga, Severstal, Sochi, Neftekhimik, KRS
Technical reglement rules
It shows us if the club fulfilling all technical standards for arena. When the pandemic is over, this criterion will also include the level of service to fans at arena.
Top: Amur, Salavat Yulaev, SKA
Bottom: KRS, Sibir, Minsk
TV Index
This criterion shows the share of club on league´s revenues from TV/streaming & betting agreements. So, if the games of your clubs are often on TV & televisions pay more to the league for acquiring the rights = your club getting more points in ranking. Jokerit is undisputed leader.
Top: Jokerit, Riga, SKA, Avangard, CSKA
Bottom: Torpedo, Vityaz, Sochi, Neftekhimik, Amur
Match-day revenues
It is criterion for match-day revenues per person. The league takes into account the average workers´ salary in region. Therefore Moscow teams are at the bottom, with Jokerit
.
Top: Salavat Yulaev, Avto, Sibir, Torpedo, Metallurg
Bottom: Jokerit, Spartak, CSKA, Minsk, Vityaz, KRS
Social media
The league evaluates the clubs´ work with media, journalists & their social media accounts. It also includes the fans reaction (positive/negative comments, reposts, likes etc).
Top: Avangard, Ak Bars, SKA, CSKA, Salavat Yulaev
Bottom: Riga, Amur, Neftekhimik, Sochi, KRS
Full article. I will upload all partial graphs. The final table of the clubs´ rating is below.
The rating is an instrument for the KHL Board of Directors how to objectively evaluate the clubs. The KHL BoD excluded Lada & Yugra for being at the bottom of the ranking. But, it does not mean your club is automatically excluded for being at the bottom of the ranking. The KHL BoD can take other criteria into account when deciding on exclusion. All potential new clubs are evaluated on the methodics of this ranking.
The rating has 9-10 criteria – standings (20%), standings value (20%), financing (10%), salary payment (5%), arena capacity & attendance (10%), technical reglement rules (10%), TV Index (10%), match-day revenues (10%), work with social media & media outlets (5%).
Standings
It is simply the result on ice, so standing after regular-season & playoffs. The most succesful teams getting more points.
Top: CSKA, Avangard, Ak Bars, SKA, Dynamo Msc
Bottom: Sochi, Amur, KRS, Minsk & Riga
Standings value
It is the connection between the financing spent on salaries & points in the standings. So, the club with average budget but better results on ice is at the top of the ranking.
Top: Barys, Jokerit, Avangard, CSKA, Torpedo
Bottom: Traktor, Riga, Metallurg, Amur, KRS
Financing
It shows us how the club is dependant on government & state corporations funding. Less public money in your budget, more points in the rating. Three clubs are fully private-financed, they are Jokerit, Severstal, KRS. All three having all available points (10)
Top: Jokerit, Severstal, KRS, Metallurg, Avto
Bottom: Ak Bars, Sochi, Vityaz, Barys, Avangard
Salary payment
It is about players´ salaries payments by clubs. If club pays on time, getting more points. Ten clubs have been on time with salaries payments for all three seasons.
Top: Avangard, Avto, Ak Bars, Jokerit, Loko, Metallurg, Neftekhimik, Severstal, SKA, CSKA
Bottom: Sibir, Torpedo, Barys, Sochi, Amur
Arena capacity & Attendance
The league takes the arena with 12 000 seats as ideal for criterion calculation, so getting full points. Lower capacity = less points. Attendance is taken from average occupancy, only 2018-19 a 2019-20 seasons due to pandemic.
Top: SKA, Spartak, Metallurg, Minsk, Avto
Bottom: Riga, Severstal, Sochi, Neftekhimik, KRS
Technical reglement rules
It shows us if the club fulfilling all technical standards for arena. When the pandemic is over, this criterion will also include the level of service to fans at arena.
Top: Amur, Salavat Yulaev, SKA
Bottom: KRS, Sibir, Minsk
TV Index
This criterion shows the share of club on league´s revenues from TV/streaming & betting agreements. So, if the games of your clubs are often on TV & televisions pay more to the league for acquiring the rights = your club getting more points in ranking. Jokerit is undisputed leader.
Top: Jokerit, Riga, SKA, Avangard, CSKA
Bottom: Torpedo, Vityaz, Sochi, Neftekhimik, Amur
Match-day revenues
It is criterion for match-day revenues per person. The league takes into account the average workers´ salary in region. Therefore Moscow teams are at the bottom, with Jokerit
.
Top: Salavat Yulaev, Avto, Sibir, Torpedo, Metallurg
Bottom: Jokerit, Spartak, CSKA, Minsk, Vityaz, KRS
Social media
The league evaluates the clubs´ work with media, journalists & their social media accounts. It also includes the fans reaction (positive/negative comments, reposts, likes etc).
Top: Avangard, Ak Bars, SKA, CSKA, Salavat Yulaev
Bottom: Riga, Amur, Neftekhimik, Sochi, KRS
Full article. I will upload all partial graphs. The final table of the clubs´ rating is below.
Last edited: