I didn’t even know SARMs were banned.. mostly because I didn’t think they even worked.
This. It’s SARMs. They’re the BCAAs of PEDs.
I didn’t even know SARMs were banned.. mostly because I didn’t think they even worked.
Hmmmm, and that's why you've got to get into the NHL/AHL as quickly as possible where no one is ever caught for doping.
Or is this site of the opinion that hundreds of athletes continuously performing herculean feats of athleticism, needing to rapidly recover from injury, and needing all the endurance they can get.... don't consume substances which would help them do all of those things? Despite millions of dollars being on the line if you could just get a little bit stronger. A little bit faster. Recover a little sooner.
Was that Nate or Nick? I know both have been extremely vocal about this so I'm never 100% sure which said what.“I've been saying that I'm surprised that people are surprised. You know, I've been years in this sport. I've had the top people come up to me, trying to push this stuff on me all the time. I'm like, 'when you've done what I've done, we can't even consider talking about this. And even then, still, no.
But it's like, when people approach me I'm like 'what the f***? Everyone's on steroids” ~ Nate Diaz
That's been the go-to excuse for ages. I wouldn't take anything at face value at this point. Could have been intentional, could have been unintentional, ya never know.How many of you who are commenting actually read the article, his statement, and the other article by Friedman? From the reporting, it was tainted supplements and not something he was intentionally taking.
Seems like an honest mistake, apparently it’s found in lots of supplements.
The only reason he was even subject to testing was Olympics being backup goalie for US, he did not fail any NCAA test or anything.
So you didn't read the article. Got it.That's been the go-to excuse for ages. I wouldn't take anything at face value at this point. Could have been intentional, could have been unintentional, ya never know.