Jesse-Thanks as always for taking our questions!
Many of the players talk about the seamless transition of going from Ontario up to the Kings because of the system that is in place at both levels and that presumably includes the special teams. The power play down in Ontario was one of the best in the league while the Kings were one of the worst. Can you break down what would lead to such a stark difference despite having a similar system in place? Level of play/PK Strategy/Personnel/Buy In/Execution/etc.
What goes into the decision of choosing players for the power play unit? It would seem to me that your best players may not necessarily be your best power play option as they may be stronger on 2-way play, transition, board play, etc that might not be as important on the power play vs. 5 on 5. Do you try to form a certain combination of players (1 puck carrier/1 quarter back/1 shooter/1 net presence/1 puck retriever etc.)? Do you deploy different strategy/style between PP1 and PP2 based on personnel?
How difficult is it to adopt new PP strategies as a player? As an example, if a player has become very accustomed to the style of being on the half wall and just remaining there as a QB and you ask him to adopt a style to be more mobile and create more movement, is that difficult to do from a mental perspective?
I'll leave it there. Thanks!