CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,725
- 59,475
Did you have trouble understanding my post? I suggest reading it againOh Game 7, on the road
Go stare at your Sparks poster lol.
Did you have trouble understanding my post? I suggest reading it againOh Game 7, on the road
Go stare at your Sparks poster lol.
I just think the Leafs are way better than Carolina.lol you're absolutely ridiculous man. I'm scared to even reply to you.
I did not suggest anything of the sort. Just providing an example of something they do different than us.
Since we're on the topic though, you'd be a fool not to analyze Carolina...seeing as they coasted their way through the semifinals and are now one matchup away from entering the finals.
Beat the Caps and an Isles team that swept the Pens. You're telling me it's not worth looking into ? Get out of here with that garbage talk.
Defence matters, especially in the playoffs.I just think the Leafs are way better than Carolina.
Defence being the exception of course.
Defence matters, especially in the playoffs.
Dubas thought we were okay on defence. Acquired Muzzin as an afterthought, and declared it good enough.
Nylander should have been traded for a D as soon as it was clear he was holding out. Instead, he overpaid Nylander, and then, Nylander came back from his holdout, underperformed big time, causing his trade value to be reduced.
Also, by overpaying Nylander, instead of trading him, he then made it near impossible to get a decent deal done with Matthews and Marner.
The more things change, the more they remain, oh so Leafy.
You pretty much got it all correct I think.Defence matters, especially in the playoffs.
Dubas thought we were okay on defence. Acquired Muzzin as an afterthought, and declared it good enough.
Nylander should have been traded for a D as soon as it was clear he was holding out. Instead, he overpaid Nylander, and then, Nylander came back from his holdout, underperformed big time, causing his trade value to be reduced.
Also, by overpaying Nylander, instead of trading him, he then made it near impossible to get a decent deal done with Matthews and Marner.
The more things change, the more they remain, oh so Leafy.
The Muzzin trade WAS AN AFTERTHOUGHT. Defence should have been addressed after the 2016, 2017, and 2018 seasons. Nothing was done until 2019. Clearly our D has been a weakness in EVERY PLAYOFFS since we started making them again.Muzzin was an afterthought? You dont trade a 1st+ for an afterthought.
It’s amazing how Boston went from one of the most penalized teams to having such a positive penalty differential in these playoffs.
Yet Bruins fans have spent the entire 11 games saying the refs are against them.
Yes I’m salty, leave me alone
It's also technically correct that they did better this year, at .500 (4 wins, 4 losses) than that year, at .455 (5 wins, 6 losses).It’s technically correct though. The best kind of correct.
Chara's skates can probably skate faster without his feet in them.I know a lot of people who can run faster than Chara skates.
Stupid SexyFlandersBruins
Where was Dubas when CAR signed Maenalanen last May? Nice free wallet signing by Waddell.
Long time lurker first time poster here, pls tell me the secret code for making a strike through
It’s amazing how Boston went from one of the most penalized teams to having such a positive penalty differential in these playoffs.
Yet Bruins fans have spent the entire 11 games saying the refs are against them.
Yes I’m salty, leave me alone
Perfectly legitimate. If a player seems to be injured, play only stops when his team gains control of the puck. An obvious injury is different, but you don't want players faking injury just to stop play. I'm not suggesting Bishop was faking it, but that is the rule.That 3 rd Blues goal will add some fodder for sports radio this week. I think the rule stands.
If you haven’t seen it- a shot from the point pegged Bishop in the collar bone and knocked him down. The Blues gain control of the rebound and scored while the goalie was down and hurt.
Perfectly legitimate. If a player seems to be injured, play only stops when his team gains control of the puck. An obvious injury is different, but you don't want players faking injury just to stop play. I'm not suggesting Bishop was faking it, but that is the rule.
Oddly enough, if his mask had come off, the whistle is blown (different rule).