> SPORTS  > HFBOARDS
HFBoards  
Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
 

Gagner and Cogliano Just Aren't That Good

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-22-2009, 12:39 AM
  #1
Bryanbryoil
Scandinavian Sniper
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Paajarvi-Svensson
Posts: 27,846
vCash: 500
Gagner and Cogliano Just Aren't That Good

This IMO is a major problem with this team. It seems as if Eberle and MPS will be better players and quite frankly neither of Cogs or Gagner are good enough to be leading players on this club now or in the future from what I can see. If we are to be contenders in the future we either need to move these guys for better players or give them contracts that reflect their play and not over pay them because there are MANY players that are as young or younger than they are that are already far better players. At this rate Cogs better not expect much more than a 10% qualifying offer raise.
Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:41 AM
  #2
guymez
Visionary
 
guymez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,204
vCash: 500
Aren't you being a bit of a negative Nancy here?
guymez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:42 AM
  #3
camboy
time for change #18
 
camboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 707
vCash: 500
Ssssh, don't tell everybody. Tambellini is working on trading them to Washington for Semin.
camboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:42 AM
  #4
dashingsilverfox*
Mellow
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Paradise
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,631
vCash: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
This IMO is a major problem with this team. It seems as if Eberle and MPS will be better players and quite frankly neither of Cogs or Gagner are good enough to be leading players on this club now or in the future from what I can see. If we are to be contenders in the future we either need to move these guys for better players or give them contracts that reflect their play and not over pay them because there are MANY players that are as young or younger than they are that are already far better players. At this rate Cogs better not expect much more than a 10% qualifying offer raise.
Incredibly negative BBO.

Where are the positives?
dashingsilverfox* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:42 AM
  #5
jumptheshark
and now I am back
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: nowhere
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 26,545
vCash: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
This IMO is a major problem with this team. It seems as if Eberle and MPS will be better players and quite frankly neither of Cogs or Gagner are good enough to be leading players on this club now or in the future from what I can see. If we are to be contenders in the future we either need to move these guys for better players or give them contracts that reflect their play and not over pay them because there are MANY players that are as young or younger than they are that are already far better players. At this rate Cogs better not expect much more than a 10% qualifying offer raise.
you better watch it

we have a negative nancy cop running around here and he may tell you to stop being SOOOOO negative
__________________
Joy of being an oiler fan--watching the team play worse then AHL teams. Guess the oiler brass is already on the golf course
jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:43 AM
  #6
Narnia
Worst Fans Ever!
 
Narnia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,896
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
This IMO is a major problem with this team. It seems as if Eberle and MPS will be better players and quite frankly neither of Cogs or Gagner are good enough to be leading players on this club now or in the future from what I can see. If we are to be contenders in the future we either need to move these guys for better players or give them contracts that reflect their play and not over pay them because there are MANY players that are as young or younger than they are that are already far better players. At this rate Cogs better not expect much more than a 10% qualifying offer raise.
Gags was stuck with grinders, Jacques and Stortini. What do you expect?
__________________
"He just ate up Robyn Regehr for dinner, a spectacular play by Hemsky, and Robyn Regehr has got doo doo all over his face" - Rod Phillips call on Hemsky's goal vs the Flames
Narnia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:44 AM
  #7
dashingsilverfox*
Mellow
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Paradise
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,631
vCash: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narnia View Post
Gags was stuck with grinders, Jacques and Stortini. What do you expect?
Maybe expect them to be good enough so they're not stuck with grinders?
dashingsilverfox* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:45 AM
  #8
Moonlapse Vertigo
Go Rush Go!
 
Moonlapse Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,380
vCash: 500
They don't have any quality veteran forwards to set an example for them offensively. Hemsky sleeps through practice and gets called out for it and Horcoff gets paid a heinous amount of money to win face-offs (something that he can't even do right now because of a shoulder problem). Unless Tambellini finds a way to cut something like 4-5 million this off season to sign some good solid veterans, the Oilers are going to continue slogging on a treadmill.

Eberle and Paajarvi could struggle just as easily as Gagner and Cogliano if the Oilers continue on insisting that their veteran forward core is "good enough".
Moonlapse Vertigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:46 AM
  #9
alphahelix
Hockey Scientist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,960
vCash: 500
Does anyone else remember when Cogliano/Gagner/Nilsson was this teams second line and we were actually GOOD? We came within a hair of the playoffs and won big down the stretch. Must have some sort of unbelievable coaching/goaltending when those players comprise 50% of your top 6, most of them with no prior NHL experience, and you win like crazy.
alphahelix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:46 AM
  #10
Patch101
Ranford will always be #1
 
Patch101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 1,162
vCash: 500
I think its way to early to say that man. Gagner is still VERY young, and still has some growing up to do. Cogs is a bit older so I expect more from him, but again he's a young guy. You can't put a lot pressure on them yet. Same thing with Gilbert.

I expect the vets to contribute more. The more I keep hearing people bang on the young players ... the more I believe we need another veteran guy here. We really need a guy Like Nolan. We are a really young team.
Patch101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:46 AM
  #11
Discipline
Registered Genius
 
Discipline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,375
vCash: 500
Blog Entries: 1
They are our only options right now.
Discipline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:48 AM
  #12
Moonlapse Vertigo
Go Rush Go!
 
Moonlapse Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,380
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphahelix View Post
Does anyone else remember when Cogliano/Gagner/Nilsson was this teams second line and we were actually GOOD? We came within a hair of the playoffs and won big down the stretch. Must have some sort of unbelievable coaching/goaltending when those players comprise 50% of your top 6, most of them with no prior NHL experience, and you win like crazy.
They weren't being keyed on. Which is really quite crazy because they were putting up points over the course of 20plus games.
Moonlapse Vertigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:48 AM
  #13
Moonlapse Vertigo
Go Rush Go!
 
Moonlapse Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,380
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patch101 View Post
I think its way to early to say that man. Gagner is still VERY young, and still has some growing up to do. Cogs is a bit older so I expect more from him, but again he's a young guy. You can't put a lot pressure on them yet. Same thing with Gilbert.

I expect the vets to contribute more. The more I keep hearing people bang on the young players ... the more I believe we need another veteran guy here. We really need a guy Like Nolan. We are a really young team.
Exactly right. The veterans continue to be a major, major problem.
Moonlapse Vertigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:51 AM
  #14
saskyoil
Balanced Attack
 
saskyoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Clean Slate
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,400
vCash: 500
Ridiculous post.

Gagner could still be playing in the minors or major juniour at his age right now.
saskyoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 12:59 AM
  #15
Datsun
Registered User
 
Datsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,630
vCash: 245
Gagner is 20. I'll wait longer to see if he's "just not that good".
Datsun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:00 AM
  #16
Dazed and Confused
Defining the Oilers:
 
Dazed and Confused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 549
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
This IMO is a major problem with this team. It seems as if Eberle and MPS will be better players and quite frankly neither of Cogs or Gagner are good enough to be leading players on this club now or in the future from what I can see. If we are to be contenders in the future we either need to move these guys for better players or give them contracts that reflect their play and not over pay them because there are MANY players that are as young or younger than they are that are already far better players. At this rate Cogs better not expect much more than a 10% qualifying offer raise.
And I'd be willing to bet a lot that all, but a small, small, # of them will go though similar slumps in their young careers.
Dazed and Confused is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:11 AM
  #17
Seachd
Moderator
Vopnafjörður
 
Seachd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Fail
Posts: 9,019
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Datsun View Post
Gagner is 20. I'll wait longer to see if he's "just not that good".
This is true. I can't believe some people expect them to be huge contributors right now.
__________________
Ef þú getur lesið þetta, þá ertu vitrari en flestir.
Seachd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:15 AM
  #18
Gags89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 489
vCash: 500
Come on...they are still both very young. Give them a bit. Especially Gagner. I have to agree with Datsun here. Let them mature a bit.
Gags89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:17 AM
  #19
dashingsilverfox*
Mellow
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Paradise
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,631
vCash: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags89 View Post
Come on...they are still both very young. Give them a bit. Especially Gagner. I have to agree with Datsun here. Let them mature a bit.
Yeah, no one should expect Kane, Toews, Kopitar or Doughty to be very good.

They're just too young.
dashingsilverfox* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:20 AM
  #20
jadeddog
dive 4 5 is alive :(
 
jadeddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 7,600
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seachd View Post
This is true. I can't believe some people expect them to be huge contributors right now.
most people don't expect them to be huge contributors, i think most of us would be happy if they were at least treading water .... but its their 3rd NHL seasons, and they are simply *terrible*... gagner has played a couple decent games and thats it... cogliano has been beyond horrible all season... both are soft as butter, neither plays good defence, neither can win a faceoff to save their lives and neither plays even a resemblence of a physical game.... what *exactly* are they doing thats even neutral, let alone positive?

i was actually coming on here to start this exact same thread.... its their 3rd NHL season, good players have mostly separated themselves by this point... i'm not saying there isn't a chance one of them becomes a useful hockey player, but history certainly isn't on their side... i would be willing to place a large bet that gagner never breaks 60 points in the NHL and cogliano never breaks 50... we saw a bunch of reasons to start questioning their abilities last season, and we're witnessing a lot more reasons this year

i have a gagner signed rookie jersey, so it really pains me to say this - but in all liklihood he'll never be more than a complimentary 2nd line player... i don't even think cogliano will reach those lofty heights, as i can't see him being anything more than a role-player, or possibly a 2nd line player on a very bad team
jadeddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:21 AM
  #21
Gags89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 489
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashingsilverfox View Post
Yeah, no one should expect Kane, Toews, Kopitar or Doughty to be very good.

They're just too young.
They've got players to play with. And were all top 4 picks. On the Oilers we've got...Hemsky? This year Penner has gained back his game too but not the same calibre guys to play along with.
Gags89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:23 AM
  #22
nullterm
Registered User
 
nullterm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnaby, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 884
vCash: 500
Gags and Cogs are victims of oberhype. They'll be very good players, but not elite. The Kid Line flash the one season definitely fed into it. But now they can't surprise people.

The one danger I see in the organization is putting too much stock in them and bet on them being more than they will be. Both with roster makeup and contracts. I'm worried Gags will get a bad contract because so many people see him so highly.
nullterm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:23 AM
  #23
alphahelix
Hockey Scientist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,960
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seachd View Post
This is true. I can't believe some people expect them to be huge contributors right now.
didn't we just get smoked by toews and kane? just sayin'
alphahelix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:25 AM
  #24
Chayos
Registered User
 
Chayos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Posts: 2,200
vCash: 500
I think grouping these 2 players together is unfair. Gagner has done pretty much everything asked of a 20 year old player IMO. Cogliano is fair game though and as shown by the poll of Brule or Cogliano, he has been outclassed by a new comer.

I think its a natural thing when a new coaching staff comes in to see some players excel like Penner, but there are always some players who fail under new leadership. I think Gilbert, Horcoff and Coglaino are good examples of that under Quinn.

I think this game really exposed how far the Oiler are from being elite level. I think we are closer to picking Taylor Hall than we are to making the playoffs.
Chayos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-22-2009, 01:27 AM
  #25
PenzOil
Mr. Tzar Kastik
 
PenzOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,486
vCash: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
This IMO is a major problem with this team. It seems as if Eberle and MPS will be better players and quite frankly neither of Cogs or Gagner are good enough to be leading players on this club now or in the future from what I can see. If we are to be contenders in the future we either need to move these guys for better players or give them contracts that reflect their play and not over pay them because there are MANY players that are as young or younger than they are that are already far better players. At this rate Cogs better not expect much more than a 10% qualifying offer raise.
they'll be easier to sign this offseason... get em signed to good deals first and then think about trading em..
PenzOil is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.