> SPORTS  > HFBOARDS
HFBoards  
Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
 

Toronto - Chicago. not involving versteeg or sharp!!1one

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-10-2009, 05:01 PM
  #1
Dangler Status
#89
 
Dangler Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 691
vCash: 928
Toronto - Chicago. not involving versteeg or sharp!!1one

This is a ridiculous proposal value vise but if you consider cap and contract length would you do it?

Kaberle + Poni + Toskala

for

Campbell + Hossa + Huet

Toronto gets a top flite forward, excellent PMD, and good albiet struggling 1b goaltender. loses cap mobility

Chicago gets a solid 40 - 60 point producer with a large frame, an elite PMD, and a decent 1b goaltender as well as millions in cap space.

Apparently the deal is REALLY lopsided in Chicago's favor.
What if the Leafs added Jeff Finger and Chicago added a 1st?
__________________

Last edited by Dangler Status: 11-10-2009 at 05:16 PM.
Dangler Status is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:03 PM
  #2
Quik
The pain that unites
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Burkie's Dog House
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,445
vCash: 500
lol at Chicago trying to unload their 3 worst contracts on Toronto.
Quik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:07 PM
  #3
Curtis Belfour
Welcome to T.O.
 
Curtis Belfour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,485
vCash: 500

You can't possibly be a leafs fan.
Curtis Belfour is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:10 PM
  #4
Monstar50
New Monster?
 
Monstar50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 483
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangler Status View Post
This is a ridiculous proposal value vise but if you consider cap and contract length would you do it?

Kaberle + Poni + Toskala

for

Campbell + Hossa + Huet

Toronto gets a top flite forward, excellent PMD, and good albiet struggling 1b goaltender. loses cap mobility

Chicago gets a solid 40 - 60 point producer with a large frame, an elite PMD, and a decent 1b goaltender as well as millions in cap space.
Sounds great but, Hossa is signed until he is 42, Campbell until he is 37, and huet until he is 36. Not to metion a total cap hit of 18 million.
Monstar50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:11 PM
  #5
thepublichairs
"rebuilding"
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 276
vCash: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangler Status View Post
This is a ridiculous proposal value vise but if you consider cap and contract length would you do it?

Kaberle + Poni + Toskala

for

Campbell + Hossa + Huet

Toronto gets a top flite forward, excellent PMD, and good albiet struggling 1b goaltender. loses cap mobility

Chicago gets a solid 40 - 60 point producer with a large frame, an elite PMD, and a decent 1b goaltender as well as millions in cap space.
This trade is bad for Toronto. We would lose a hell of a lot of cap space. We would gain about 9 million and screw ourselves over for the next decade.
thepublichairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:15 PM
  #6
slapshot723
Jealous?
 
slapshot723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,451
vCash: 500
I don't think that's such a bad trade for either team, but CHI can't afford to give up Hossa after they just signed him.

Change Hossa to Brouwer and change Poni to Stajan.
slapshot723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:15 PM
  #7
Dangler Status
#89
 
Dangler Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 691
vCash: 928
It's really that lopsided? I thought there would at least be some debate.

what if the Leafs added Jeff Finger and the Hawks added a first?
Dangler Status is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:16 PM
  #8
Bubba88
Registered User
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Germany
Country: Germany
Posts: 690
vCash: 500
who will be #1 goalie for Chicago?

toskala
niemi


but i like that deal after the stanley cup finals for next year
Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:17 PM
  #9
Monstar50
New Monster?
 
Monstar50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 483
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by slapshot723 View Post
I don't think that's such a bad trade for either team, but CHI can't afford to give up Hossa after they just signed him.

Change Hossa to Brouwer and change Poni to Stajan.
I would think the only reason the leafs would even consider this for 1 second is because we get hossa at 5.2M.
Monstar50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:17 PM
  #10
dynrehab
Do or do not.
 
dynrehab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Victoria BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,078
vCash: 500
I'd like to propose we leave Campbell and Kaberle out of all proposals, as it's the same arguement, over and over again.
dynrehab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:18 PM
  #11
Iskandm004
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 148
vCash: 500
How about

CHI:Toskala Finger Blake

TO: Cambell Hossa
Iskandm004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:19 PM
  #12
Monstar50
New Monster?
 
Monstar50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 483
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskandm004 View Post
How about

CHI:Toskala Finger Blake

TO: Cambell Hossa
Leafs would take that, but don't think Chicago trades hossa any time soon.
Monstar50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:20 PM
  #13
Dangler Status
#89
 
Dangler Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 691
vCash: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynrehab View Post
I'd like to propose we leave Campbell and Kaberle out of all proposals, as it's the same arguement, over and over again.
nobody is arguing about Campbell and Kaberle...

there of the same level (maybe a slight edge to kaberle) and Kaberles cap hit and term is far more friendly and thats it. arguement over.
Dangler Status is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:20 PM
  #14
Ludicrous Speed
Sink for Seguin
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Comeblowus, OH
Country: United States
Posts: 5,669
vCash: 807
Blog Entries: 5
of course this favors the Leafs. It would automatically get them to the Cup Finals.
Ludicrous Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:20 PM
  #15
Bubba88
Registered User
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Germany
Country: Germany
Posts: 690
vCash: 500
@ all


STOP PROPOSALS between Chicago and Toronto.
Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:21 PM
  #16
thepublichairs
"rebuilding"
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 276
vCash: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskandm004 View Post
How about

CHI:Toskala Finger Blake

TO: Cambell Hossa
So basically Chicago gets a 4 million dollar Back Up Goalie, a 3.5 million dollar 3rd pair defensemen and a 4 million dollar second liner. This deal is bad as well.
thepublichairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:21 PM
  #17
Dangler Status
#89
 
Dangler Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 691
vCash: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
of course this favors the Leafs. It would automatically get them to the Cup Finals.
Dangler Status is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:22 PM
  #18
thepublichairs
"rebuilding"
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 276
vCash: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
of course this favors the Leafs. It would automatically get them to the Cup Finals.
Your a Columbus fan right? So why again are you trolling on a Chicago/Toronto trade proposal thread?
thepublichairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:23 PM
  #19
Iskandm004
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepublichairs View Post
So basically Chicago gets a 4 million dollar Back Up Goalie, a 3.5 million dollar 3rd pair defensemen and a 4 million dollar second liner. This deal is bad as well.
The point is u save money to sign your core young players and these players have much less terms on them plus toskala is a UFA at the end of the yearr
Iskandm004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:24 PM
  #20
slapshot723
Jealous?
 
slapshot723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monstar50 View Post
I would think the only reason the leafs would even consider this for 1 second is because we get hossa at 5.2M.
But why would Chicago want to trade Hossa? They just made a huge investment on him, and I think they believe he's an integral part of this team, whatever the cap hit. Campbell and Huet, I understand, but not Hossa.
slapshot723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:25 PM
  #21
Ludicrous Speed
Sink for Seguin
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Comeblowus, OH
Country: United States
Posts: 5,669
vCash: 807
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepublichairs View Post
Your a Columbus fan right? So why again are you trolling on a Chicago/Toronto trade proposal thread?
First, I'm not trolling. I made a funny that I guess you didn't get. I didn't think I needed .

Second, why does it matter what team I root for?

Toronto says no to the trade. There.

Last edited by Ludicrous Speed: 11-10-2009 at 05:34 PM.
Ludicrous Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:25 PM
  #22
Monstar50
New Monster?
 
Monstar50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 483
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by slapshot723 View Post
But why would Chicago want to trade Hossa? They just made a huge investment on him, and I think they believe he's an integral part of this team, whatever the cap hit. Campbell and Huet, I understand, but not Hossa.
Thats the reason the trade will never work. Huet has zero value to us, and cambell (while underrated) is not needed because of kaberle.
Monstar50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:26 PM
  #23
slapshot723
Jealous?
 
slapshot723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monstar50 View Post
Thats the reason the trade will never work.
It can work if Hossa wasn't involved. He's not the deal-breaker in this trade IMO.
slapshot723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:29 PM
  #24
Iskandm004
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 148
vCash: 500
How about

CHI:Toskala

TO: Huet and Sharp
Iskandm004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-10-2009, 05:31 PM
  #25
Dangler Status
#89
 
Dangler Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 691
vCash: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by slapshot723 View Post
It can work if Hossa wasn't involved. He's not the deal-breaker in this trade IMO.


Hossa at 5.2 makes this trade what it is for the Leafs.

remember that eventhough he will be making 5.2 in cap when hes in his 40s his salary will be 1m (ish) this is incredible for a team in a small market looking to reach the cap floor 5.2 in cap for only 1 million of real money
Dangler Status is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.