> SPORTS  > HFBOARDS
HFBoards  
Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
 

Deadline: Chicago - Atlanta

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-16-2009, 01:44 PM
  #1
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Deadline: Chicago - Atlanta

To Chicago
Ilya Kovalchuk (UFA after this season)

To Atlanta
Brian Campbell
Akim Aliu
2010 1st Round Pick
2010 2nd Round Pick



Its no secret Campbell was pursued by Atlanta his UFA year but chose Chicago despite the fact Atlanta offered more. I don't see why Atlanta still isn't interested given the fact Campbell had a career year offensively and is on pace to have a better one this season.

As for the Hawks, they add Kovalchuk to an already impressive lineup and gain the cap space they need to get the big 3 signed this off season.

Of course this deal would only work if Atlanta cant get Kovalchuk signed or if Kovalchuk has no intentions of re-signing which is a possibility.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:47 PM
  #2
C For Choke
The Flames Suck
 
C For Choke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,474
vCash: 50
Those picks are going to be low. Needs high end prospects, not a guy who was barely PPG in the OHL and attitude problems.
C For Choke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:49 PM
  #3
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by C For Choke View Post
Those picks are going to be low. Needs high end prospects, not a guy who was barely PPG in the OHL and attitude problems.
The picks and prospects are flexible, the Hawks also have (3) 2nd round picks as well so it doesn't have to be the Hawks 2nd.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:50 PM
  #4
wej20
Registered User
 
wej20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Swansea/Bath UK
Country: Wales
Posts: 3,252
vCash: 2408
terrible for the thrashers
wej20 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:51 PM
  #5
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wej20 View Post
terrible for the thrashers
For a rental?

HA

There isn't one contender deep enough down the pipeline to offer a better deal.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:51 PM
  #6
ArVeeDee
Embrace the Trash
 
ArVeeDee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,161
vCash: 500
This is quite possibly one of the worst trade proposals i've ever seen.

A bust - Third liner max potential
A 25th-30th pick
An equally late second
A guy with a massive contract that no one wants

For a top ten player in the league.

Campbell's contract being in is a must but at least give us something GOOD.
ArVeeDee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:51 PM
  #7
hockynight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
To Chicago
Ilya Kovalchuk (UFA after this season)

To Atlanta
Brian Campbell
Akim Aliu
2010 1st Round Pick
2010 2nd Round Pick



Its no secret Campbell was pursued by Atlanta his UFA year but chose Chicago despite the fact Atlanta offered more. I don't see why Atlanta still isn't interested given the fact Campbell had a career year offensively and is on pace to have a better one this season.

As for the Hawks, they add Kovalchuk to an already impressive lineup and gain the cap space they need to get the big 3 signed this off season.

Of course this deal would only work if Atlanta cant get Kovalchuk signed or if Kovalchuk has no intentions of re-signing which is a possibility.

ok not a fan of either team but this could work there is no telling if HAwks will resign him well they reall cant but what would the lines be then

Kovy Toews Hossa
Sharp Bolland Kane

great top 6
hockynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:52 PM
  #8
hockynight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 361
vCash: 500
then again it seems likea big over payment for HAlf a year
UNLESS the hawks can get a better # 1 goalie and make a serious push for the cup
hockynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:53 PM
  #9
btn
Global Moderator
Gots my drinking cup
 
btn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ATL
Country: Iran
Posts: 12,416
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
I don't see why Atlanta still isn't interested given the fact Campbell had a career year offensively and is on pace to have a better one this season.
Because Ron Hainsey is giving them similar production at half the cost, and they will need to roll the dough out for Bryan Little, Zach Bogosian, and Evander Kane while Campbell is under contract.


Not signing Campbell was a lucky break for the Thrashers. They now have very solid depth at offensive/two-way defenseman, the hole Campbell was going to fill has already been filled.
btn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:53 PM
  #10
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArVeeDee View Post
This is quite possibly one of the worst trade proposals i've ever seen.

A bust - Third liner max potential
A 25th-30th pick
A equally late second
A guy with a massive contract that no one wants

For a top ten player in the league.
And what contender can offer more then that if Kovalchuck has no intentions of re-signing with you guys in the off season?

You aren't getting an All Star defensemen back in any rental deal period.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:54 PM
  #11
C For Choke
The Flames Suck
 
C For Choke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,474
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
For a rental?

HA
Kovalchuk can re-sign if he so chooses though.

Lets say you're DW.

Kovy has yet to re-sign until he sees what the team can do. Now, do you trade him for some low picks, and a decent yet overpaid puck mover. Or, do you keep him and see if you can do well in the playoffs and sign him long term?

It's a high risk/high reward situation.
C For Choke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:57 PM
  #12
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by C For Choke View Post
Kovalchuk can re-sign if he so chooses though.

Lets say you're DW.

Kovy has yet to re-sign until he sees what the team can do. Now, do you trade him for some low picks, and a decent yet overpaid puck mover. Or, do you keep him and see if you can do well in the playoffs and sign him long term?

It's a high risk/high reward situation.
If I knew Kovalchuck was going to bolt the second July 1st hits I would trade him at the deadline and get something in return for him.

Campbell, a 1st and 2nd plus a prospect is a great return.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:57 PM
  #13
btn
Global Moderator
Gots my drinking cup
 
btn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ATL
Country: Iran
Posts: 12,416
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
And what contender can offer more then that if Kovalchuck has no intentions of re-signing with you guys in the off season?
Anyone can offer late 1st and 2nd rounders.

Akim Aliu, there are plenty of teams that could offer a better forward prospect than that.

Campbell has a terrible contract, that is already giving the Hawks headaches. It hurts his value quite a bit. Plus, as I mentioned above, he really doesn't fill a particular need the Thrashers have. The Thrashers would want Top 6 forwards/prospects to fill the hole Ilya leaves in their lineup.
btn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:58 PM
  #14
IslesDude
Registered User
 
IslesDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 408
vCash: 500
Pretty terrible.

I think it'd have to be something like

Versteeg
Campbell
Beach
First

For

Kovalchuk
Kubina

something along those lines. The fact that Kovalchuk is a rental for Chicago doesn't make him any less valuable to other teams. Someone is going to offer a MUCH better package than that for IK.
IslesDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 01:59 PM
  #15
AtlantaWhaler
Registered User
 
AtlantaWhaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta
Country: United States
Posts: 1,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
Campbell, a 1st and 2nd plus a prospect is a great return.
No...no it's not.

At all.
AtlantaWhaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:00 PM
  #16
Rhodes 10
Registered User
 
Rhodes 10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,800
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
To Chicago
Ilya Kovalchuk (UFA after this season)

To Atlanta
Brian Campbell
Akim Aliu
2010 1st Round Pick
2010 2nd Round Pick



Its no secret Campbell was pursued by Atlanta his UFA year but chose Chicago despite the fact Atlanta offered more. I don't see why Atlanta still isn't interested given the fact Campbell had a career year offensively and is on pace to have a better one this season.

As for the Hawks, they add Kovalchuk to an already impressive lineup and gain the cap space they need to get the big 3 signed this off season.

Of course this deal would only work if Atlanta cant get Kovalchuk signed or if Kovalchuk has no intentions of re-signing which is a possibility.
good god
Rhodes 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:01 PM
  #17
slapshot723
Jealous?
 
slapshot723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,451
vCash: 500
Campbell won't waive his NMC to go to Atlanta. Wasn't he offered more money to play for them than the Hawks?
slapshot723 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:01 PM
  #18
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by btn View Post
Anyone can offer late 1st and 2nd rounders.

Akim Aliu, there are plenty of teams that could offer a better forward prospect than that.

Campbell has a terrible contract, that is already giving the Hawks headaches. It hurts his value quite a bit. Plus, as I mentioned above, he really doesn't fill a particular need the Thrashers have. The Thrashers would want Top 6 forwards/prospects to fill the hole Ilya leaves in their lineup.
And no GM is going to offer up those types of players at the deadline because they don't have spare parts like that handy. Unless they have an injured star player that will be injured for the rest of the season and they dont intend on having him back for the next I don't see a GM moving 1st and 2nd line guys at the deadline.

Obviously with that said the only other option is to try and trade his rights after the season in which Atlanta will get nothing more then a 5th or 6 round pick.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:03 PM
  #19
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaWhaler View Post
No...no it's not.

At all.


So you think a team THAT HAS A REASON TO ACQUIRE Kovalchuk at the deadline can pay more then that?

I would love to see the playoff bound team you speak of offer up their entire 2nd line for Kovalchuck.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:05 PM
  #20
Hawksfan2828
Registered User
 
Hawksfan2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by slapshot723 View Post
Campbell won't waive his NMC to go to Atlanta. Wasn't he offered more money to play for them than the Hawks?
Yes he was offered more money by Atlanta.

If I'm Bowman I tell Campbell to accept this trade or he will be in the AHL next season.
Hawksfan2828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:06 PM
  #21
AtlantaWhaler
Registered User
 
AtlantaWhaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta
Country: United States
Posts: 1,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
And no GM is going to offer up those types of players at the deadline because they don't have spare parts like that handy. Unless they have an injured star player that will be injured for the rest of the season and they dont intend on having him back for the next I don't see a GM moving 1st and 2nd line guys at the deadline.

Obviously with that said the only other option is to try and trade his rights after the season in which Atlanta will get nothing more then a 5th or 6 round pick.
I somewhat agree, but the point is that your offer will be the worst to cross Waddell's desk. Campbell's awful contract, late picks, and a so-so prospect won't win the sweepstakes.
AtlantaWhaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:07 PM
  #22
btn
Global Moderator
Gots my drinking cup
 
btn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ATL
Country: Iran
Posts: 12,416
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
And no GM is going to offer up those types of players at the deadline because they don't have spare parts like that handy. Unless they have an injured star player that will be injured for the rest of the season and they dont intend on having him back for the next I don't see a GM moving 1st and 2nd line guys at the deadline.
I am not asking for 1st or 2nd liners, I want bonifide prospects. Like Cody Hodgson, or Grachev with the Rags. Those players are always available for a talent like Ilya, and if you don't have one....you are going to be at a decided disadvantage if Ilya is on the block.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
Obviously with that said the only other option is to try and trade his rights after the season in which Atlanta will get nothing more then a 5th or 6 round pick.
I have to admit, these comments always crack me up.

The Thrashers are the ones with the valuable commodity, and there will be at least 10 teams if not more interested in Ilya if he comes on the trade market. The Thrashers do not have to take your only offer or lose him to free agency, they will have many different options to chose from.....and will pick the option that Waddell and Dudley feel is the best one for the Thrashers.
btn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:16 PM
  #23
Rhodes 10
Registered User
 
Rhodes 10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,800
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
And no GM is going to offer up those types of players at the deadline because they don't have spare parts like that handy. Unless they have an injured star player that will be injured for the rest of the season and they dont intend on having him back for the next I don't see a GM moving 1st and 2nd line guys at the deadline.

Obviously with that said the only other option is to try and trade his rights after the season in which Atlanta will get nothing more then a 5th or 6 round pick.
bouwmeester's rights got leopold and a 3rd round pick. i'd care to say that ilya kovalchuk is substantially better than bouwmeester and his rights are worth substantially more.

it doesn't seem out of the question that his rights could garner a 2nd line player and a mid round draft pick from a team with depth.

either way they can trade kovalchuk at the deadline for much better than that proposal

campbell has zero value to atlanta. even with kovalchuk no longer playing full powerplays on the left point enstrom, bogosian, hainsey, and kubina will all still be ahead of him on the depth chart for atlanta's powerplay time. he's not outstanding defensively and at best could take kubina's spot on the 2nd pairing if salmella, kulda, and postma still aren't ready to take on that spot next season. his only value to atlanta would be as trade bait and in regards to his contract that means none.

campbell could be included if needed as a salary dump and i'm sure the thrashers could find some way to re-sign their young talent but he can't be the centerpiece in a deal for the 4th best forward in the league. even as a rental.
Rhodes 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:24 PM
  #24
Drake1588
Centurion
 
Drake1588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 16,620
vCash: 500
Campbell... Hawks fans need to reconcile themselves with the reality that this is a contract that 29 teams are glad, in retrospect, they never offered the player and his representation. It's just not a tradeable contract, short of a 70-point season from Campbell.

That one would try to use him as the centerpiece in a deal to land Kovalchuk is pure comedy.
Drake1588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-16-2009, 02:30 PM
  #25
xicethug13x
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ADDISON
Country: United States
Posts: 430
vCash: 500
how about this which would be way more beeficial for both teams
TO ATLANTA:
versteeg

to CHICAGO:

ondrej pavelec
and a second rounder

the hawks have athe makings of a team that can be a dynasty for the next 10-15 years all thats missing is a good goalie...this gives them a good young cheap goalie that can stick with the team for a dynasty run..and they get some cap relief by letting go of a very good young forward but that is where we are deepest...then huet is sent to either the minors or the khl we eat the salary and save the cap hit and have away better goalie for years to come
xicethug13x is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.