> SPORTS  > HFBOARDS
HFBoards  
Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
 

Will The Rangers walking away from Zherdev award (UPD: Rangers decline, Zherdev UFA)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-04-2009, 12:47 PM
  #1
Little Bunny Foo Foo
Field mice bopper
 
Little Bunny Foo Foo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The forest
Posts: 4,896
vCash: 308
Will The Rangers walking away from Zherdev award (UPD: Rangers decline, Zherdev UFA)

Lower the value of future arbitration awards or have no effect?
Little Bunny Foo Foo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 12:53 PM
  #2
Crazy_Ike
Look, sour grapes!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,155
vCash: 500
No effect, this is something the CBA planned for.

It might make players more careful about filing for it, but probably not.
Crazy_Ike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 12:57 PM
  #3
kdb209
Registered User
 
kdb209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,723
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Bunny Foo Foo View Post
Lower the value of future arbitration awards or have no effect?
Zero effect. If the Rags exercise their walkaway rights, the award and the fact of the walkaway are completely inadmissible in any future arbitration hearing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA Article 12.9(g)(iii)
(iii) The following categories of evidence are inadmissible and shall
not be considered by the Salary Arbitrator:
...
(G) Any reference to actual or potential walk-away rights;

(H) Any award issued by a Salary Arbitrator as to which a Club
exercised its walk-away rights pursuant to Section 12.10;
kdb209 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 01:01 PM
  #4
LadyStanley
Global Moderator
Sharks are the best!
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Posts: 25,465
vCash: 500
And the Rangers do walk away.
LadyStanley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 01:02 PM
  #5
Little Bunny Foo Foo
Field mice bopper
 
Little Bunny Foo Foo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The forest
Posts: 4,896
vCash: 308
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdb209 View Post
Zero effect. If the Rags exercise their walkaway rights, the award and the fact of the walkaway are completely inadmissible in any future arbitration hearing.
Thanks, that's why I asked the question here...
Little Bunny Foo Foo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 01:49 PM
  #6
mouser
Global Moderator
great seats
 
mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Mountain
Posts: 5,736
vCash: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdb209 View Post
Zero effect. If the Rags exercise their walkaway rights, the award and the fact of the walkaway are completely inadmissible in any future arbitration hearing.
There is one effect, albeit marginal: future arbitration cases wouldn't be able to use Zherdev as a comparable player with a $3.9m contract.
mouser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 02:07 PM
  #7
Crazy_Ike
Look, sour grapes!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,155
vCash: 500
Does anyone feel Zherdev will get 3.9m on the open market?
Crazy_Ike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 03:00 PM
  #8
LadyStanley
Global Moderator
Sharks are the best!
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Posts: 25,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy_Ike View Post
Does anyone feel Zherdev will get 3.9m on the open market?
This is getting a bit beyond the BOH forum focus and tending towards the "Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk" forum.

(My guess is that the Rangers put feelers out to see if they could get something for him and couldn't find any takers; so I'm guessing not, unless he heads to the KHL.)
LadyStanley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2009, 06:27 PM
  #9
SJeasy
HF Boards sponsor
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 5,585
vCash: 500
The only comparable walkaway that I recall was Dumont. He was awarded $2.9mil and ended up signing for $2.0mil. LS probably has the pulse of the issue and I imagine the KHL is a possibility.
SJeasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2009, 10:12 PM
  #10
Kezia
Live Love Burn Die
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,076
vCash: 450
Quick question about Zherdev

Is he a UFA at the end of his contracts from now on? Or will he be an RFA depending on his age/seasons played?


Thank you in advance to those who will hopefully answer my question
Kezia is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2009, 10:22 PM
  #11
LadyStanley
Global Moderator
Sharks are the best!
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Posts: 25,465
vCash: 500
It'll depend on the length of his contract. (Arb award was 2 years; so he's at least two years from being an UFA.)

So if his next contract expires before his UFA status based on age and experience, he'll still be a RFA.
LadyStanley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2009, 10:28 PM
  #12
TheCH
Registered User
 
TheCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,187
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
It'll depend on the length of his contract. (Arb award was 2 years; so he's at least two years from being an UFA.)

So it his next contract expires before his UFA status based on age and experience, he'll still be a RFA.
But he is a UFA right now so i would imagine he will take advantage of that. I can't see him signing such a short deal that he would still be an rfa at the end of it.
TheCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-09-2009, 10:28 PM
  #13
Kezia
Live Love Burn Die
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,076
vCash: 450
Thanks
Kezia is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2009, 01:36 AM
  #14
mouser
Global Moderator
great seats
 
mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Mountain
Posts: 5,736
vCash: 905
The responses here are correct that a RFA->UFA could become an RFA again depending on experience in the league.

Wanted to note that Zherdev is only one season away from becoming a UFA anyways. The cutoff is seven accrued seasons in the NHL and Zherdev currently has six [five played + one season credit for the lockout].
mouser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2009, 01:55 AM
  #15
kdb209
Registered User
 
kdb209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,723
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouser View Post
The responses here are correct that a RFA->UFA could become an RFA again depending on experience in the league.

Wanted to note that Zherdev is only one season away from becoming a UFA anyways. The cutoff is seven accrued seasons in the NHL and Zherdev currently has six [five played + one season credit for the lockout].
Correct. Just because a player becomes a Non-Group 3 UFA at an early age does not mean that he is not subject to RFA restrictions until they reach actual Group 3 status.

That was why Paul Kariya signed his cheap one year deal with Colorado in '03-'04 (after not being qualified @ $10M by the Ducks). It had nothing to do with selflessness and wanting to win a cup - it had to do with Group V UFA status (10+ NHL seasons and earning < League Average Salary). By signing a 1 yr deal below the league average, he could become a UFA again after that season. If he signed for any higher, he would have become an RFA and not been UFA eligible again until '06 (based on the 31 yo age limit in the old CBA).
kdb209 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.