> SPORTS  > HFBOARDS
HFBoards  
Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
 

NHL attendance down, everything else up

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-07-2009, 09:39 AM
  #76
Foy
It's Too Easy
 
Foy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 13,431
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flames123 View Post
(
I know its not just that easy, but my point was the NHL (garry bettman) continues to place franchises in bad locations and keep teams away from the evil canadians.

AND the whole succeeding in a market is not happening with teams like TB, Phoenix (I dont have time to look for all of the NHL teams that a losing money). In a canadian market I believe team would be able to maintain die hard fan that will show up every night. And the most important part of succeeding is winning. Last time i checked preds, stars, TB, florida, phoenix, LA were all out of the playoffs. THEY DID NOT SUCCEED.
You realize you just blamed Gary Bettman for the failure of "southern teams" and then listed 6 teams, 5 of which Gary Bettman had nothing to do with the placement of, right?

By your logic is Edmonton a failure? Is Ottawa a failure? Neither of them made the playoffs last year.
__________________
"[Langway] would not have won the Norris without the offensive numbers he had." - Fuhr86
Foy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-07-2009, 01:34 PM
  #77
LadyStanley
Global Moderator
Sharks are the best!
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Posts: 24,341
vCash: 500
http://www.fromtherink.com/2009/10/3...s-on-nashville
In part 6 of his series on Nashville, Mirtle looks at the viability as a hockey market.
LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-07-2009, 02:36 PM
  #78
njdevsfn95
Play 3 - "Layered" D
 
njdevsfn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 5,864
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivianmb View Post
[/b][/color]
got a link ?
devils fans shouldn't throw rocks when they live in glass houses.
http://www.andrewsstarspage.com/inde...since_1989_90/

and the capacity of the Winnipeg Arena was 15,565.

also, never once did BrodeursCups say the Devils would sell out. but clearly he was correct about Winnipeg's past.
__________________
Remember what my old signature said? Click HERE if you are interested.
njdevsfn95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-07-2009, 02:53 PM
  #79
The Falconer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,883
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flames123 View Post
This must be a little bit old. I was watching the highlights and the Thrashers had maybe 5,000 people at the game, even though they reported as 10,000.
Well I was in the building and there were clearly more than 5,000 people.
The Falconer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2009, 03:53 AM
  #80
flames123
Rookie User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foy View Post
You realize you just blamed Gary Bettman for the failure of "southern teams" and then listed 6 teams, 5 of which Gary Bettman had nothing to do with the placement of, right?

By your logic is Edmonton a failure? Is Ottawa a failure? Neither of them made the playoffs last year.
You know the argument I was trying to make. The southern teams were more likely to be out of playoff historically. And I wasn't blaming Bettman for the placement of those team but rather for the attitude of wanting to keep those teams there. Canadian teams make up for 31% of ticket revenues. Thats 20% of the teams making up for 31% of the ticket revenue. The main reason is because there are many more fans that want to go to game (so there are frequent sell-outs) and they can charge upward of $400 for a playoff ticket. I'd like to see other teams in the south do that.


TICKET LINK: http://www.rivercitysportsblog.com/r...icket-revenue/
ANOTHER LINK YOU'LL FIND INTERESTING: http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/31/...ions_Rank.html

I never said those teams were failures, just that they combined low or non existant income with losing.

Last edited by flames123: 11-08-2009 at 04:03 AM.
flames123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2009, 05:40 AM
  #81
GHOSTofMAROONSroad
Registered User
 
GHOSTofMAROONSroad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maroons Rd.
Posts: 1,944
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Falconer View Post
Well I was in the building and there were clearly more than 5,000 people.
The NHL listed official attendance at just over 10K for the Nov. 5, 2009 game in Atlanta versus the Blue Jackets. See here:

http://www.nhl.com/scores/htmlreport...0/ES020210.HTM

ESPN.com provided extensive pics of the game (6 pages of them) so people can judge on their own whether it appears there was a good turn out for the game. I suspect that you are correct and that there were at least or more than 5,000 fans in attendance. See here:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/photos...1105028&page=1

There are 6 pages of pics from the game at the ESPN.com link, not many of which show shots of the crowd, but some select pics can be seen in the below links which are of ESPN.com photo's from the Nov. 5th game:

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/8639/41000325.jpg

http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2253/87849361.jpg

http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/1888/18020421.jpg

http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/2984/80677459.jpg

GHOST
GHOSTofMAROONSroad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2009, 05:53 AM
  #82
GHOSTofMAROONSroad
Registered User
 
GHOSTofMAROONSroad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maroons Rd.
Posts: 1,944
vCash: 500
Correction: the NHL's official attendance number for the Nov. 5th game was not "just over" 10K, but was rather "almost" 11K.

GHOST
GHOSTofMAROONSroad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2009, 01:00 PM
  #83
PensFan101
Max. Talbot. Legend.
 
PensFan101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Owen Sound
Country: Canada
Posts: 976
vCash: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kritter471 View Post
As has been well documented in other threads, many fans of traditional markets, Canadian or otherwise, have not shown up during prolonged stretches of poor play. The only exceptions are Toronto and Montreal. Boston, Detroit, Edmonton, Vancouver, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Calgary, Ottawa, Minnesota (North Stars) and others have had very noticeable attendance slumps when play has dropped off.

But let me see if I understand your argument in the previous post - you're saying teams that don't win should be moved? And that attendance has a direct correlation to on-ice success? Have you heard of the Toronto Maple Leafs?
The Leafs and Canadians are the exceptions, rather than the rule, as you pointed out in your own post. A lot of teams have trouble when they struggle. But I agree, attendance isn't a 1:1 correlation to team success. The New Jersey Devils have been competitive for years but have struggled to sell out some playoff games in the past.
PensFan101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2009, 09:38 PM
  #84
njdevsfn95
Play 3 - "Layered" D
 
njdevsfn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 5,864
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PensFan101 View Post
The Leafs and Canadians are the exceptions, rather than the rule, as you pointed out in your own post. A lot of teams have trouble when they struggle. But I agree, attendance isn't a 1:1 correlation to team success. The New Jersey Devils have been competitive for years but have struggled to sell out some playoff games in the past.
True, we have sold out all 7 playoff games at the Prudential Center, though, while enjoying the same amount of "success" as the first two years after the lockout.
njdevsfn95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-12-2009, 04:26 AM
  #85
LadyStanley
Global Moderator
Sharks are the best!
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Posts: 24,341
vCash: 500
http://www.defendingbigd.com/2009/11...-look-to-raise
Looking at the Dallas attendance.

Quote:
The NY Times reported that NHL attendance is down league wide 1.1% through November 2nd for the same period last year. The Stars, through eight games, report total attendance at 135,648. Last season their number through eight games was 142,981. By my math that is a 5.13% decrease to an average of 16,956.
LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-12-2009, 11:05 PM
  #86
nyrmetros
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,768
vCash: 500
And how's MSG doing thus far?
nyrmetros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-12-2009, 11:51 PM
  #87
guyincognito
still goofy
 
guyincognito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,436
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyrmetros View Post
And how's MSG doing thus far?
only Dolan knows.
guyincognito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2009, 04:37 PM
  #88
trueblue9441
Registered User
 
trueblue9441's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bronx, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,179
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by guyincognito View Post
only Dolan knows.
officially every game has been a "sellout" but anyone who has been to a game or watched a game on tv can say that they havent been selling out.. more empty seats down low.. pushing ticket packages on their website and tv like they havent done in the past.. the only reason they are probably making more money this year is because of all of the price increases they put onto the season ticket holders like me once again
trueblue9441 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2009, 06:27 PM
  #89
guyincognito
still goofy
 
guyincognito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,436
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueblue9441 View Post
officially every game has been a "sellout" but anyone who has been to a game or watched a game on tv can say that they havent been selling out.. more empty seats down low.. pushing ticket packages on their website and tv like they havent done in the past.. the only reason they are probably making more money this year is because of all of the price increases they put onto the season ticket holders like me once again
it's their right to announce them as sellouts, but they've been out there marketing, and when the Rangers are marketing (think the Czechmates commericals and Bobby Granger after the lockout), they normally have seats to sell.

pretty much everyone other than the Flyers fudge though, and the Flyers probably don't fudge because they're too cheap to buy the tickets.

from looking at boxscores for the last few weeks while I've been gone, it does look like attendance is slumping a bit around the league. Colorado had a bad midweek game recently, which was surprising because they've been much better than expected.... unless they just lost alot of STH's or something
guyincognito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2009, 06:34 PM
  #90
Kritter471
I'm a GIRL, dangit
 
Kritter471's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dallas
Country: United States
Posts: 4,021
vCash: 500
Dallas is being hurt by a down local economy (much of the lower bowl is corporate seats, and those are the tickets that are taking some of the biggest beatings in terms of sales) and the team's ineptitude last year.

I would also think the sky-high prices at JerryWorld (i.e. Cowboys Stadium) hurt the other three teams in the area because those are the gold-standard of corporate tickets, and they're taking a significantly larger cut of the local market now.
Kritter471 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2009, 08:06 PM
  #91
kdb209
Registered User
 
kdb209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,576
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by guyincognito View Post
From looking at boxscores for the last few weeks while I've been gone, it does look like attendance is slumping a bit around the league. Colorado had a bad midweek game recently, which was surprising because they've been much better than expected....unless they just lost alot of STH's or something
Considering that Colorado was the third worst team last season, had little reason to expect an improvement this season, was about to lose their biggest name and face of the franchise to retirement, still had one of the highest avg ticket prices, and was facing all that during a deep recession - I would guess they lost a lot of STHs.

This is a point that is missed by many here - attendance is (in many cases) as much a function of the teams performance the previous year as it is their current performance. STH are a significant driver of attendance - especially for those mid week games against less popular teams - and the decision to buy season tickets is made in the off season based on the least season's performance and next season's expectations.

Case in point - the San Jose Sharks. The Sharks have had one "bad" season attendance wise. It was not the year ('02-'03) when they crashed and burned (fired the coach and GM midseason, traded away their captain, and missed the playoffs) - it was the following season (when won their division and made the Western Conf finals).

2000-01: 17,468
2001-02: 17,422
2002-03: 17,350
2003-04: 15,835
2004-05: lockout
2005-06: 16,831
2006-07: 17,422
2008-09: 17,488

That one bad year eroded the STH base - which had previously been capped at 14K with a waiting list. The lockout further eroded it. It wasn't until the second post-lockout year that it recovered to previous levels.
kdb209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 12:13 AM
  #92
OilersFaninVan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 72
vCash: 500
What I don't get is why people always talk about sell outs like they mean something. I have lived in Edmonton and now live in Vancouver. Both teams sell out almost every game and let's face it neither team has had much to brag about for a long while other then the 06 run by the Oilers. Yet they are also doing it selling nose bleed tickets for almost 50 dollars a ticket while some of the southern teams when they do sell out it's with the you get 2 tickets ,a meal, and beverages all included for 40 dollars. This is the reason sell outs don't mean anything in my opinion.
OilersFaninVan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 04:37 AM
  #93
GHOSTofMAROONSroad
Registered User
 
GHOSTofMAROONSroad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maroons Rd.
Posts: 1,944
vCash: 500
LA Kings @ Thrashers, Friday night, announced official attendance a respectable: 15,638.

Pics from ESPN.com:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/photos?gameId=291113028

Some select ESPN.com pics from the above link:

http://img339.imageshack.us/i/76125260.jpg/

http://img84.imageshack.us/i/34963620.jpg/

Nice to see the discounted tickets pay off!

GHOST
GHOSTofMAROONSroad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 10:09 AM
  #94
81ragnaH
2010: For Fred
 
81ragnaH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lynn, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTofMAROONSroad View Post
LA Kings @ Thrashers, Friday night, announced official attendance a respectable: 15,638.

Pics from ESPN.com:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/photos?gameId=291113028

Some select ESPN.com pics from the above link:

http://img339.imageshack.us/i/76125260.jpg/

http://img84.imageshack.us/i/34963620.jpg/

Nice to see the discounted tickets pay off!

GHOST
it's hard to tell in the pics, was the arena attendance close to the announced attendance?

pretty impressive nonetheless, considering the Hawks played (and beat) the Celtics at the same time this game was going on.
81ragnaH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 10:24 AM
  #95
frivolousz21
Registered User
 
frivolousz21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Country: United States
Posts: 999
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilersFaninVan View Post
What I don't get is why people always talk about sell outs like they mean something. I have lived in Edmonton and now live in Vancouver. Both teams sell out almost every game and let's face it neither team has had much to brag about for a long while other then the 06 run by the Oilers. Yet they are also doing it selling nose bleed tickets for almost 50 dollars a ticket while some of the southern teams when they do sell out it's with the you get 2 tickets ,a meal, and beverages all included for 40 dollars. This is the reason sell outs don't mean anything in my opinion.
Exactly...

the blues just sold out on a Thursday...with ticket promos.


we are at like 98 percent capacity for the year with mostly sell outs.

but we have cheap tickets....sure helps.
frivolousz21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 12:18 PM
  #96
ColoradoHockeyFan
Looking for another
 
ColoradoHockeyFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denver area
Country: United States
Posts: 8,986
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdb209 View Post
Considering that Colorado was the third worst team last season, had little reason to expect an improvement this season, was about to lose their biggest name and face of the franchise to retirement, still had one of the highest avg ticket prices, and was facing all that during a deep recession - I would guess they lost a lot of STHs.
You would guess correctly (as usual).

And on top of all of those factors, toss in an implied (if not explicit) message from ownership that the primary focus of the summer would be salary dumping, and that competitiveness should not be expected for a few years, along with a Western Conference Finals appearance by the primary seasonal competitor for the local sports entertainment dollar--and Pepsi Center co-tenant... and you have a perfect storm for a ticket base erosion.
ColoradoHockeyFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 01:00 PM
  #97
LadyStanley
Global Moderator
Sharks are the best!
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Posts: 24,341
vCash: 500
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL...slam!%20hockey
Sun harps on attendance woes. Looks at some of the promos for Tampa, Columbus, Anaheim, Detroit (and Phoenix).
LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 01:38 PM
  #98
Tinalera
Sonja says hi
 
Tinalera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Known Universe
Posts: 1,251
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL...slam!%20hockey
Sun harps on attendance woes. Looks at some of the promos for Tampa, Columbus, Anaheim, Detroit (and Phoenix).
I like the Tampa one Now to find an excuse to go watch my favorite player Stamkos

I read that article too, and found it informative as far as the promos-I'm trying to find a more objective article about subject itself.
Tinalera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 04:05 PM
  #99
81ragnaH
2010: For Fred
 
81ragnaH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lynn, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL...slam!%20hockey
Sun harps on attendance woes. Looks at some of the promos for Tampa, Columbus, Anaheim, Detroit (and Phoenix).
Quote:
- The Coyotes have yet to get into the deep discounting yet, but for every win fans can turn in the ticket stub for a voucher for a future home game.
isn't that only for select games?
81ragnaH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-14-2009, 04:17 PM
  #100
guyincognito
still goofy
 
guyincognito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,436
vCash: 500
one thing people don't realize about the food/drink promos is how little the food and drink is actually worth to the teams.

I can't even imagine what the bulk price for soda or crappy hot dogs is for a huge sports arena. so, if you have a 2 seats, dogs and soda promo for $60, you could price the seats at $29 each, and the dogs and soda at 50 cents apiece, and the team is probably still turning a miniscule profit on both.
guyincognito is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline LLC ©2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.