2009 Draft HF future projections

Devils13
07-04-2009, 05:22 PM
Josefson- 7.5 B
Gelinas- 7.5 C/D
Alexander Urbom- 7C
Helgeson-7C
Derrick Rodwell- 6c
Ashton Bernard- 5.5D
Curtis Gedid - 5.5C

Just for fun ill do my projected top 20 rankings for this upcoming year

1. Tedenby
2. Joesfson
3. Bergfors
4. Corrente
5. Frazee
6. Halischuk
7. Burlon
8. Eckford
9. Gelinas
10. Palmieri
11. Zharkov
12. Vasyunov
13. Wohlberg
14. Henrique
15. Nagy
16. McIntyre
17. Hoeffel
18. Miller
19. Fraser
20. McPherson

After the top 10 it gets real close and the only reason palmieri is as low as he is, is because of his inconsitency problems even though besides tedenby and josefson I think he has the highest offensive potential

NJ4
07-04-2009, 05:30 PM
Happy B-Day!

Devils13
07-04-2009, 05:34 PM
Happy B-Day!

haha thanks

Harrison Ford
07-04-2009, 05:46 PM
I agree with those, but I think Urbom and Helgeson will both be 6.5C. I wouldn't be surprised if Josefson was 7.0B either.

Anssi is epic
07-04-2009, 05:53 PM
I agree with those, but I think Urbom and Helgeson will both be 6.5C. I wouldn't be surprised if Josefson was 7.0B either.

yep.

Harrison Ford
07-04-2009, 05:54 PM
Also, if Gelinas is a 7.5, it will be a 7.5D, not C. Which I think is right to begin with.

Feed Me A Stray Cat
07-04-2009, 07:40 PM
Does anyone else find the HF board ratings mind-numbingly useless? They're dependent on the biases of the individual team writers and thus do not display any continuity.

Classic Devil
07-04-2009, 09:02 PM
Does anyone else find the HF board ratings mind-numbingly useless? They're dependent on the biases of the individual team writers and thus do not display any continuity.
Mind numbingly. Sorry Jared.

Jared Ramsden
07-05-2009, 12:23 AM
haha, no offense taken:laugh:....I should tell you guys though, that after I submit my original draft for a Top 20 re-ranking, it is siffted over by all the other HF staff, therefore trying to take some of the bias out of it. For the most part, I do have the final say, but usually for any top 20, if there is enough argument or support for a change, it will be changed. I don't get to see a lot of these players play, so I listen attentively if there is some feedback from people who have seen some of our prospects play.