O.T. Another ******** call in the MTL/Kings game !!!DEVILS ALL THE WAY 03-08-2008, 05:34 PM The Los Angeles Kings just scored a goal but it was disallowed because the ref called a "unintentional interfence on the goaltender". Kyle Calder was standing in front of Halak but he NEVER touch him and if he did "interfere" with the goaltender, why didn't he get a penalty ??? The guy was screening the goaltender for god sakes... THIS IS COMPLETE ********* :rant: Hellsempire 03-08-2008, 05:40 PM The Los Angeles Kings just scored a goal but it was disallowed because the ref called a "unintentional interfence on the goaltender". Kyle Calder was standing in front of Halak but he NEVER touch him and if he did "interfere" with the goaltender, why didn't he get a penalty ??? The guy was screening the goaltender for god sakes... THIS IS COMPLETE ********* :rant: It was a BS call and all the love for Montreal from Bettman and the NHL referees. Makes me want to puke. ALine9900 03-08-2008, 05:42 PM I hate Montreal. Hellsempire 03-08-2008, 05:43 PM I hate Montreal. +1 You are not alone there. DEVILS ALL THE WAY 03-08-2008, 05:45 PM I hate Montreal. +1.... and 3564654986549849874 x 65465765468465498498 = 25465465463465465469846165465146546516463146546546 54646216546549847 !!! The good thing is that L.A. is manhandling the Habs after 1 period. daveskirtun 03-08-2008, 05:47 PM Was it like the call against Holmstrom during the Ducks game? DEVILS ALL THE WAY 03-08-2008, 06:01 PM Was it like the call against Holmstrom during the Ducks game? worst... he wasn't in the crease and never interfered with the goalie. Yes, he was screaning him but isn't that what coaches teach you when you start playing hockey around pee-wee ?!?!? DevilFisch 03-08-2008, 07:18 PM Referees make bad calls? Really? Wow, didn't know that. Though if there was truly a bias for Montreal, why do they have so many losses? | ||