ScottyBowman 02-17-2006, 11:57 AM I don't know what it is but I'm just not into them as much as I thought I would be. I remember during the 2002 olympics, their were many more storylines, more "superstars", more passion etc.. A lot of these guys look like they were forced to play.
sabresrat 02-17-2006, 11:58 AM I think it's been pretty disappointing so far, but I bet it gets more exciting during the medal round.
Big Mama* 02-17-2006, 12:06 PM The upsets have been good. The games have been excellent.
You are making this comment only 2 days into a 9 day 12 day tournament...?
Borlag 02-17-2006, 12:13 PM The only way it could be considered as a dissappointment is if you judge it according how Team USA does in it :shakehead
ScottyBowman 02-17-2006, 12:13 PM The only way it could be considered as a dissappointment is if you judge it according how Team USA does in it :shakehead
I'm cheering for Sweden. This has nothing to do with the US.
shawn_kemp* 02-17-2006, 12:15 PM This tournament is awesome!!!
2006 > 2002
and there are much more games to come, especially big matchups such as Czech-Canada, USA-Russia, Sweden-USA, Finland-Canada, and so on!!!
freekjo 02-17-2006, 12:16 PM Not a disappointment at all. There have been several great games so far. The Slovakia - Russia game was super, and the upsets were fun to watch as well. Russia's dominance over Sweden was impressive.
The only thing which disappoints me so far is the fysical aspect of the game. The new rules discourage use of power, which I believe has to be a part of the game.
I've only seen a few good, hard (and fair) bodychecks...
Borlag 02-17-2006, 12:19 PM Fine, but still...the big games are still ahead and I for one can't see how the games so far could be considered as dissappointments. There's been great hockey from good countries as well as great hockey from countries that are considered not so good. There's been surprise victories and there's also been surprising slumps for some teams.
Just about all teams have their best players on ice, apart from the few who are injured and the few who have refused for other reasons, which is something that's beyond everyones control.
The only dissappointing thing in the Olympics so far has been the inconsistency of refereeing. But for that too it's way too early to say that it's hopeless, just 2 rounds behind with 6 more to go.
shawn_kemp* 02-17-2006, 12:20 PM I think some people might be disappointed because of the 9 big games of the round robin, only 2 have been played yet (Svk-Rus & Rus-Swe).
twelve 02-17-2006, 12:21 PM Not at all.
It's nice to see some smaller hockey countries making an effort and succeeding.
And although the Finns beat the Swiss, it was great watching their passing and combinations.
And anyway, all teams and players will pick up the pace in the next few games.
LuigiStone 02-17-2006, 12:21 PM For Team USA and Sweden maybe.
It's the time difference for some people.
Telecaster Fanatic 02-17-2006, 12:28 PM I have enjoyed all the games so far, even our game vs Russia.
It's still early. The medal round will be intense.
I think the 'best on best' tournaments are not what they used to be though. All players know each other these days, and a world cup/olympic takes place every 2 years.
Thinking back to even the '98 olympics - there just seemed to be much more pressure.
cfrancis 02-17-2006, 12:33 PM The time difference sucks for me. All the games are early in the morning when I'm at work. This weekend will be good as I can watch them live.
Phil333 02-17-2006, 12:42 PM I haven't been disapointed at all. I've seen some good hockey and passionate players who love their country. Did you see the way Ovechkin jumped up in the air yesterday when he scored that goal? That gave me goosebumps and I'm an American. I loved seeing Latvia give Slovakia a run for their money. But I have it easy. I'm a college student so I have a lot more free time during the day than people who work 9-5. This weekend should feature some great matchups. So don't get down 2 days in. This is a great tournament and it will reveal itself as such as the days go along.
Hashmark 02-17-2006, 12:43 PM It's all about the time difference.. Not being able to go to the bar and cheer on your country over a few pints really sucks. Instead of getting hyped for the game all day at work, and enjoying it at night, we know about the results by mid-afternoon and just watch highlights at night.
Not much you can do about that..
You are making this comment only 2 days into a 9 day 12 day tournament...?The thread is a perfect example of the instant gratification society we live in. People expect every game to be their new favorite game of all time, and if a couple games dont live up to the lofty expectations, they are disappointed.
I think I would be more suprised if someone wasnt complaining about something on here.
gobolt7 02-17-2006, 12:48 PM A lot of these guys spent the first two days getting over jet lag. I think by this weekend, you will see a rise in the intensity level for most of the games.
PhillyDevil 02-17-2006, 12:52 PM A lot of these guys spent the first two days getting over jet lag. I think by this weekend, you will see a rise in the intensity level for most of the games.
Exactly. The schedule was also set up so that most of the power contries got to play their easy games first, almost like a preseason. The good games really start this weekend.
That being said, the early games were actually better than I expected with a few good upsets.
weaponomega 02-17-2006, 12:57 PM I haven't been completely into them...yet.
I think a lot of it has to do with the time the games are aired. In Salt Lake, the games were on in primetime, in Nagano, I can't remember when the games were on. I remember watching Canada-US at 10 or 11 at night.
jekoh 02-17-2006, 01:11 PM It's all about the time difference.. Not being able to go to the bar and cheer on your country over a few pints really sucks. Instead of getting hyped for the game all day at work, and enjoying it at night, we know about the results by mid-afternoon and just watch highlights at night.
Not much you can do about that..
No, but having the Olympics in Europe minimizes the problem.
They should always be in Europe to accomodate more people.
HockeyCritter 02-17-2006, 05:49 PM I think the Olympics have been “disappointing” for several years now …… it’s gotten too big, too commercial, too corporate, too far removed from what the essence of the Olympics should be. It’s all about medal counts and the bottom line. Seriously, to SUSPEND a ski jumper because he covered up a corporate logo :eek: What happened to playing for the love of the game and the thrill of competition? And just what happened to the real sports, half the events aren’t even sports.
thebodyczech 02-17-2006, 05:53 PM Annoyed that the Czechs didn't show up. Thrilled that the Slovaks took over. I sense a role reversal.
Rabid Ranger 02-17-2006, 05:54 PM If I read the original poster's comments correctly I assume he's referring to the Olympics as a whole, and not just the hockey tournament. To that end, the games have been disappointing, especially for me as an American. Too many busts amongst supposedly "sure things." Most of our medals are in freaking snow boarding! Michelle Kwan, Bode Miller, the U.S. women's hockey team, etc have made for a disappointing experience so far. The overall presentation also is lacking, and frankly there just aren't that many interesting stories. Blehhhhhhhhhh. :p:
boredmale 02-17-2006, 05:57 PM the Olympics is a collection of sports for the most part that nobody cares about for 4 years. Not much to get up about.
Personally i rather have the NHL then Olympic hockey. Have a tournament to prove who is the best country like a world cup in the offseason so teams can prepare properly.
Frogurt 02-17-2006, 06:05 PM I've only seen 1 game on TV and heard 1 on the radio so far, thanks to school. Both involved my favorite team against teams outside the "Big 7." So, I'll hold judgement until I see two hockey powers collide or until Sunday when Canada plays Finland.
joshjull 02-17-2006, 06:09 PM Annoyed that the Czechs didn't show up. Thrilled that the Slovaks took over. I sense a role reversal.
That will all change with Ales Kotalik in the lineup :)
SChan* 02-17-2006, 06:11 PM the olympics has been a disappointing for INSERTCOUNTRY that hasn't performed to par.
The only way it could be considered as a dissappointment is if you judge it according how Team USA does in it :shakehead
:handclap:
In the last Olympics each "good" team (minus Slovakia) got to play only 1 bad team (Germany and Belarus). This time, teams are playing 2-3 games against bad teams, creating less interesting games.
One of the "big games" was a dud with Sweden putting in a lemon, but Slovakia-Russia was fantastic.
KINGSFANINTO 02-17-2006, 07:22 PM u guys are not happy cause USA SUCKS!!
LannysStach 02-17-2006, 07:26 PM how can a hockey fan not be lovin what’s goin down?
did you foresee Finland and Slovakia leading their groups at the 2-game break?
can you imagine one team never getting scored on thru the opening deuce? and that team being the one who lost both their #1 And #2 goalies?
is the awesomely Abeischer Swiss this year’s Belarus?
the IIHF schedules the tourney based on their international standings, and the top teams don’t face each other by design until the second half of the round-robin.
these are some of the best national teams ever assembled – the Russians!? that is Some kinda offense!
the overall unity, passion & skill of Team Canada!?
the Slovaks who are skating, passing & scoring like the 80s Oilers?
the opening two games are like being let in on the rehearsals. The show’s just about to begin.
Czechs vs. un-scored-on Finns is the masterpiece to be painted on Saturday (3 Eastern). (everybody pray to the hockey gods tonight that CBC has their ***** together for this one!)
and also, ya can’t watch the highlights and get a sense of the games. That Slovakia-Russia dipsy-doodler was just the hottie harbinger. stay freakin tuned . . .
jekoh 02-17-2006, 07:37 PM In the last Olympics each "good" team (minus Slovakia) got to play only 1 bad team (Germany and Belarus). This time, teams are playing 2-3 games against bad teams, creating less interesting games. You have the exact same 6 big teams plus Slovakia, which means MORE "interesting" games.
And the Swiss and Latvians certainly made their games interesting, more so than Belarus and Germany 4 years ago since theses two teams were going through to the next round anyway. Pretty much every second round game in 02 was meaningless.
Tyrolean 02-17-2006, 07:50 PM Some of the events are really boring unless you've participated yourself and can appreciate it. Overall it's been what I expected.
MentalPowerHouse 02-17-2006, 08:03 PM I enjoy being able to watch so many great players all on the same, and watching guys I don't get to see alot.
For Canadians the tournament has kinda started slowly as we've only played Italy and Germany so far but should start to get interesting with better opponents. The games being played at 7 am est time also hurts.
therealdeal 02-17-2006, 08:04 PM The hockey has been nothing less than amazing.
Herby 02-17-2006, 10:36 PM u guys are not happy cause USA SUCKS!!
Post of the year!!
Well done :help:
Herby 02-17-2006, 10:41 PM They set the schedule up to have almost all the games between the good and weak teams to start off.
Things are going to get really interesting the next two games.
USA vs. Slovakia
Finland vs. Russia
Then on Sunday...
Canada vs. Finland
USA vs. Sweden
And Tuesday will be the best of the prelim days...
Canada vs. Czech Rep
Slovakia vs. Sweden
USA vs. Russia
King Henry I 02-18-2006, 01:06 AM It's tough for me to judge because I've caught hardly any of the action due to school and other obligations. This weekend I have a long Jetblue plane ride where I will watch the US vs. Slovakia and later see whatever other action I can catch.
It's just heating up. Cool your jets.
octopi 02-18-2006, 01:09 AM Seriously, to SUSPEND a ski jumper because he covered up a corporate logo :eek: What happened to playing for the love of the game and the thrill of competition? And just what happened to the real sports, half the events aren’t even sports.
Someone was suspended for covering up a corporate logo? you cannot be serious!
Agree that half of the competitions are not sports. Ice dancing? Skeleton? Curling? !
jcpenny 02-18-2006, 01:54 AM The thread is a perfect example of the instant gratification society we live in. People expect every game to be their new favorite game of all time, and if a couple games dont live up to the lofty expectations, they are disappointed.
I think I would be more suprised if someone wasnt complaining about something on here .
:biglaugh: :handclap:
Big Daddy 02-18-2006, 02:14 AM The hockey has been great and is the only thing I watch in the Olympics. As far as the other events, who cares about any of the athletes in any of the sports. We only hear of these people every 4 years and I don't think anyone in North America gives a damn, the ratings are proving it. Other network prime time shows are beating the Olympics in all of the ratings.
RangersFan88* 02-18-2006, 05:30 AM the only dissapiontment is the tv coverage thats it
Firsov99 02-18-2006, 02:50 PM Switzerland beats to powerhouses. Latvia takes a point from the US. And Russia barely beats Kazakhstan: how can that be disappointing? :)
|