|
|
HabLover 01-02-2005, 11:33 PM I mean I don't think he should have been drafted at #6 last year and right now I think Andrew Ladd is looking like a bargain at #4!
Montoya totally stunk this tournament up for the USA and I was the first one on this board weeks before the tourney started asking if Montoya is up to par because of his play at Michigan, but several people came on here and said he was fine and it was the defence or the forwards for Michigan that were the problem not Montoya. Well, I think this tourney showed what those people know and Montoya was in fact struggling all along! I think everyone involved with the NYR are worried now.
Steadfast 01-02-2005, 11:38 PM right now I think Andrew Ladd is looking like a bargain at #4!
Not to get off the topic of Montoya, but no way on the Ladd thing. Olesz... Tukonen... and several others I would have taken ahead of Ladd in that position. To me Ladd looks like he will become a solid third line type forward in the NHL. Do you draft at fourth overall looking for that type of player though? I sure wouldn't.
Jonathan. 01-02-2005, 11:44 PM I mean I don't think he should have been drafted at #6 last year and right now I think Andrew Ladd is looking like a bargain at #4!
Montoya totally stunk this tournament up for the USA and I was the first one on this board weeks before the tourney started asking if Montoya is up to par because of his play at Michigan, but several people came on here and said he was fine and it was the defence or the forwards for Michigan that were the problem not Montoya. Well, I think this tourney showed what those people know and Montoya was in fact struggling all along! I think everyone involved with the NYR are worried now.
He played great in the Czech and the Swedish game. He played decent in the Russian game, but it was an entire team collapse that killed it for him.
I'm not worried at all about him. He needs to be in the AHL, however. Not the NCAA.
octopi 01-03-2005, 12:38 AM If you're talking about his overall play in the WJC tournament, then yes. Yes, he does. If you talking about in general, its way too early to make a judgement based on one bad tournament. Give him a goalie coach, make him work hard and he'll probably be okay. Then again, poor guy got drafted by the Rangers, you know how players tend to go downhill after then join that team... :help:
Sparepart 01-03-2005, 12:41 AM Tonight on RDS the commentators were saying that it looks like Montoya is injured, maybe a knee injury?
That would explain his play.
franchise player 01-03-2005, 12:45 AM Tonight on RDS the commentators were saying that it looks like Montoya is injured, maybe a knee injury?
That would explain his play.
your avatar is the best one, ever...
roadrunner 01-03-2005, 12:46 AM Montoya was the best player on the ice tonight for the USA. Why he was pulled with three minutes to go, I'll never understand.
velimiiro 01-03-2005, 01:02 AM Yes he does.
FLYLine24 01-03-2005, 01:07 AM Another Montoya thread. Why is this not locked?
If you think Montoya sucks after having a bad week then your an idiot. Plain and simple. I guess any player who has a few bad games sucks? That would be your logic it would seem. And for the record he was the best player on the ice for US today. Guess you didnt watch the game. :shakehead
Barnaby 01-03-2005, 01:09 AM Another Montoya thread. Why is this not locked?
If you think Montoya sucks after having a bad week then your an idiot. Plain and simple. I guess any player who has a few bad games sucks? That would be your logic it would seem. And for the record he was the best player on the ice for US today. Guess you didnt watch the game. :shakehead
Montoya doesn't suck. He played a solid game, but he didn't exactly look like a 6th overall pick either. I would like the pick at 8, but how did we pass up Olesz?
Reilly311 01-03-2005, 01:12 AM He was USA's best player and AGAIN kept his team in the game. He was and is the best goalie in the 2004 draft and was worthy of his #6 overall selection.
Jonathan. 01-03-2005, 01:21 AM He was USA's best player and AGAIN kept his team in the game. He was and is the best goalie in the 2004 draft and was worthy of his #6 overall selection.
I wouldn't say he was the only reason to keep his team in the game but he was an integral part of it.
He did suck in the tournament but I think he'll be a solid goalie in the NHL when the time comes.
I think everyone involved with the NYR are worried now.
I'm not worried about Al and I highly doubt the Rangers are either. So he didn't play his best in the tournament, look what he did last year. Anyway, he's just 18, I think we can give him a break.
Another Montoya thread. Why is this not locked?
If you think Montoya sucks after having a bad week then your an idiot. Plain and simple. I guess any player who has a few bad games sucks? That would be your logic it would seem. And for the record he was the best player on the ice for US today. Guess you didnt watch the game. :shakehead
Lets be fair here this was not just a few bad games .. This was the national stage in front of millions of viewers on TV and live and he struggled .. Maybe it was the pressure .. not a good sign for the future .. This will stay with him, forever I am sure ...
Ziggy Stardust 01-03-2005, 02:42 AM I've seen Montoya play live a few times (since I attended a D1 CCHA school) and wrote the following regarding Montoya after seeing him play.
"Alvaro Montoya. I know a lot of you were hoping the Kings would select him last year if it came down to him or Marek Schwarz. Not sure if he was just having a bad night or what, but looking past his record of 13-4-1, his Sv% is a subpar .896 and his GAA is at 2.55. And this Michigan club is the best defensive team in the CCHA. Montoya's weakest point is his puckhandling. He mishandled the puck quite a few times, which lead to some weak goals. On one of the goals, a simple dump in was misread by Montoya, but it is tough to fault him for that bad goal since it took a crazy bounce and went right into the net as Montoya was coming out expecting to play the puck.
Montoya also had difficulty with rebounds and at some times couldn't find the puck around scrums and bodies in front of the net. I think the Rangers took a big risk selecting him 6th overall, but the draft is a big gamble anyway. From what I've seen, Montoya should take a few years of seasoning in the minors. The Rangers should learn from their past (Blackburn) and know not to rush Montoya."
For some he just has not looked like the confident netminder who can carry his team on his back and has looked nervous in net. I don't think he is close to being NHL ready YET... but could be someday. He has the tools to be a successful NHL goalie, but he could also end up becoming another Jamie Storr.
I personally think it is a HUGE gamble and a big risk selecting a goalie early in the 1st round. I did my own research and here is a list of goalies taken in the first round from 1988-2001.
Muzzatti
Kolzig
Kidd
Brodeur
Thibault
Storr
Fichaud
Ryabchikov
Cloutier
Giguere
Biron
Boucher
Denis
Hillier
Luongo
Noronen
Damphousse
DesRochers
Chouinard
Finley
Ouellet
Ahonen
DiPietro
Krahn
Leclaire
Blackburn
Bacashihua
Munro
I am giving the guys from 2002 and on some time to prove themselves, as I am not writing off Montoya, but posting this to forewarn most of you not to get too excited when he has one good game, and not to get too disappointed when he has one bad game.
To summarize his play in Michigan (and his play at the WJC), I would say this season he has been inconsistent for the most part. And that is why I brought in Storr's name. Some nights he looked like he has all the makings of a #1 goalie. Then the next night he looks horrible. He was brought in to the pros too quickly, but the organization still gave him the vote of confidence. Unfortunately he was never able to consistently perform at the level he was expected to reach.
I know Montoya's level of play could be better than it has been recently.
PecaFan 01-03-2005, 03:49 AM I personally think it is a HUGE gamble and a big risk selecting a goalie early in the 1st round. I did my own research and here is a list of goalies taken in the first round from 1988-2001.
Make a list of all the forwards and defensemen taken in the first round. Guess what, you get the same kind of list. Some stars, some average players, some busts.
By this reasoning, you should never take a forward or defenseman in the first round either.
Montoya's just fine. He had a horrible team in front of him, and had a bad game or two. Happens *all* the time, to *all* goalies.
BCCHL inactive 01-03-2005, 03:52 AM Lets be fair here this was not just a few bad games .. This was the national stage in front of millions of viewers on TV and live and he struggled .. Maybe it was the pressure .. not a good sign for the future .. This will stay with him, forever I am sure ...
Millions of viewers on TV??? Not in the USA, I can assure you. Hell, there are more Canadian fans in attendance, on average, than American fans in North Dakota.
Stay with him forever? Not likely. Montoya already has a World U20 Gold Medal, and one that some will argue he won himself for the USA last year.
I am looking at this as just a bad couple weeks. Montoya has already proven himself a winner at this level. Marc-Andre Fleury did the same thing last year after playing relatively well in the NHL prior to the 2004 tournament...his career is going to be just fine.
Ziggy Stardust 01-03-2005, 03:53 AM By comparison take a look at the number of goalies taken in the first round.
And try reading my entire post. He doesn't have a horrible Michigan team in front of him and what the rest of you saw in the WJC I've been seeing him do during the season with the Wolverines.
They win as a team and lose as a team, and Montoya along with the rest of the team looked average (to put it kindly).
Barnaby 01-03-2005, 04:01 AM I've seen Montoya play live a few times (since I attended a D1 CCHA school) and wrote the following regarding Montoya after seeing him play.
"Alvaro Montoya. I know a lot of you were hoping the Kings would select him last year if it came down to him or Marek Schwarz. Not sure if he was just having a bad night or what, but looking past his record of 13-4-1, his Sv% is a subpar .896 and his GAA is at 2.55. And this Michigan club is the best defensive team in the CCHA. Montoya's weakest point is his puckhandling. He mishandled the puck quite a few times, which lead to some weak goals. On one of the goals, a simple dump in was misread by Montoya, but it is tough to fault him for that bad goal since it took a crazy bounce and went right into the net as Montoya was coming out expecting to play the puck.
Montoya also had difficulty with rebounds and at some times couldn't find the puck around scrums and bodies in front of the net. I think the Rangers took a big risk selecting him 6th overall, but the draft is a big gamble anyway. From what I've seen, Montoya should take a few years of seasoning in the minors. The Rangers should learn from their past (Blackburn) and know not to rush Montoya."
For some he just has not looked like the confident netminder who can carry his team on his back and has looked nervous in net. I don't think he is close to being NHL ready YET... but could be someday. He has the tools to be a successful NHL goalie, but he could also end up becoming another Jamie Storr.
I personally think it is a HUGE gamble and a big risk selecting a goalie early in the 1st round. I did my own research and here is a list of goalies taken in the first round from 1988-2001.
Muzzatti
Kolzig
Kidd
Brodeur
Thibault
Storr
Fichaud
Ryabchikov
Cloutier
Giguere
Biron
Boucher
Denis
Hillier
Luongo
Noronen
Damphousse
DesRochers
Chouinard
Finley
Ouellet
Ahonen
DiPietro
Krahn
Leclaire
Blackburn
Bacashihua
Munro
I am giving the guys from 2002 and on some time to prove themselves, as I am not writing off Montoya, but posting this to forewarn most of you not to get too excited when he has one good game, and not to get too disappointed when he has one bad game.
To summarize his play in Michigan (and his play at the WJC), I would say this season he has been inconsistent for the most part. And that is why I brought in Storr's name. Some nights he looked like he has all the makings of a #1 goalie. Then the next night he looks horrible. He was brought in to the pros too quickly, but the organization still gave him the vote of confidence. Unfortunately he was never able to consistently perform at the level he was expected to reach.
I know Montoya's level of play could be better than it has been recently.
His stickhandling is his weakest point? I would consider it a major strength. He makes the occasional bad play, but that can be worked on. I don't think you'll find many if any college players who have his skill with the puck.
We all know that not all 1st rounders make it. Some stars. Some average players. Some busts. Thats how the draft works.
Montoya was a solid pick at 6. Not the choice I woulda made, but I wouldn't consider it a reach or a huge risk as compared to the players still left. I like Olesz better, but are Valabik, Thelen, Wheeler (before him), Picard, Smid really better picks? Those were the players taken around him.
5. Wheeler
6. Montoya
7. Olesz
8. Picard
9. Smid
10. Valabik
11. Tukkonen
12. Thelen
13. Stafford
14. Dubynk
15. Radulov
Ziggy Stardust 01-03-2005, 04:13 AM I'm sorry but I've seen Montoya mishandle the puck a number of times. In one particular game, two goals he let in were a direct result of his puckkhandling. Many good scoring opportunities have come about thanks to Montoya handling the puck. I've seen him play outside of the WJC quite a few times, and his puck control is not one of his strengths. I don't know where you get the idea it is.
I think Montoya's biggest strength is his size. His reflexes aren't too sharp and could get quicker... and his positioning still needs work as well, but that is something many young goalies need to work on.
I do think Montoya was worthy of being a 1st round draft pick... but just like Wheeler going early, I think it was a reach. I'm just telling you guys not to get too disappointed when he has a terrible night and not too get too excited when he is having a great night. Just as I said earlier, the one word that best describes his season is inconsistent. He's been up and down with his performances.
Do yourselves a favor, get the sports package for your dish network or DirecTV and watch the Wolverines play on Fox Sports Michigan. You'll be impressed by the slick moves of T.J. Hensick!
FLYLine24 01-03-2005, 12:07 PM Lets be fair here this was not just a few bad games .. This was the national stage in front of millions of viewers on TV and live and he struggled .. Maybe it was the pressure .. not a good sign for the future .. This will stay with him, forever I am sure ...
How quickly people forget the pressure he faced last year and how he handled it.
SpaceGhost79 01-03-2005, 12:16 PM How quickly people forget the pressure he faced last year and how he handled it.
Since I believe he was referring to the pressure of all the national attention, last year's games don't compare because ESPN didn't air them (well, they aired the championship game about a month after the fact). There was no big deal made in the U.S. about the tourney outside of the few hardcore hockey fans.
As for Monty's puckhandling, I agree that it hasn't been great this season. A lot of times he'll stop the puck behind the net and stand there with his back to everyone and wait until the last second to get rid of it. And more times than not it tends to result in a very weak flip along the boards that either gets blocked by the opposing player (which is how some of those weak goals have been created), or it makes it to the corner where the other team still grabs it. He doesn't seem to be putting any zip behind his clearing passes.
Habsfan 32 01-03-2005, 12:50 PM I don't think he sucks he had some bad games but that happens. I do think he was picked a little early and the Rangers would have been better off picking Olesz. I just hope they will not rush him like they did to Blackburn. I think with the help of a good goalie coach like the Ranger s have this kid can be something good in 3 to 4 years and the we will see if he realy sucks.
Levitate 01-03-2005, 12:53 PM i'm pretty sure the rangers will have montoya in hartford and not bring him right up into the NHL.
PMP5030 01-03-2005, 01:31 PM i'm pretty sure the rangers will have montoya in hartford and not bring him right up into the NHL.
I'm not. These are the Rangers we're talking about, after all.
FLYLine24 01-03-2005, 03:31 PM i'm pretty sure the rangers will have montoya in hartford and not bring him right up into the NHL.
Yea, they have no need to rush him. Lundqvist will probably make it to the NHL before him anyway.
Lundqvist- HFD next season
Montoya - College next season
Lundqvist- NYR 2 season
Montoya - HFD in 2 seasons.
IMO but they wont rush him to the NHL. They are rebuilding lets not forget...its not the past anymore.
burner10115 01-03-2005, 03:37 PM I mean I don't think he should have been drafted at #6 last year and right now I think Andrew Ladd is looking like a bargain at #4!
Montoya totally stunk this tournament up for the USA and I was the first one on this board weeks before the tourney started asking if Montoya is up to par because of his play at Michigan, but several people came on here and said he was fine and it was the defence or the forwards for Michigan that were the problem not Montoya. Well, I think this tourney showed what those people know and Montoya was in fact struggling all along! I think everyone involved with the NYR are worried now.
being a ranger fan... no. he has potential, and were in no rush for his development... plus we still have blackburn and Lunds... but of course u already knew that :eek:
nurminen31 01-03-2005, 03:52 PM I dont think he sucks, but I do think he is somewhat overrated. Ive always thought Schwarz was better but thats just my opinion :)
Levitate 01-03-2005, 03:53 PM dunno, they might bring montoya to hartford next year but it would be a bit of a logjam with lundqvist coming over next year (assuming there's a NHL season next year...if not, lundqvist might stay in sweden again, though it'd probably still benefit him to come over and he might do it anyways)
but lundqvist probably will crack the NHL before montoya cuz he's several years older and much more ready for it.
Goalies traditionally have taken the longest to develop. Almost always. I think he's taken a step back this season and had a subpar WJCs for someone so highly touted, and were he draft eligible only after this season would probably be taken a lot lower.
That said, he's shown a lot of talent and a lot of promise for someone his age and he has plenty of time to grow. There's a lot of hockey left for him to play before we label him as anything, including even just saying he sucks.
Hey Ziggy, AWESOME avatar! By far the best one on this board. :joker:
Rabid Ranger 01-03-2005, 05:48 PM To answer the original question in this thread, no, Montoya doesn't suck. He's a 19 year old goaltender that has alot of physical talent but will need to have some quality coaching to adjust several technical flaws in his game if he is to succeed at the next level and beyond. Lost in all the Montoya bashing is he played very well in both the Sweden and Russia games, and based on the bronze medal game can really end on a high note. I hope he goes back to Michigan, has a great second half to the year there and can put some of the negatives of this experience behind him. If Fleury can, so can he.
|
|