Speculation: 2023-24 Sharks Roster Discussion

mogambomoroo

Registered User
Oct 12, 2020
1,340
2,233
Roster time!
It’s so much fun to do a roster projection with the #1 overall in our hands. This scenario is if we sign both Celebrini and Smith.
Also Logan Couture is back baby! Graf is a still a maybe too.
It's a very prospect heavy projection, so it's not the most realistic. But I feel some players will push for spots.

Signings:
Dakota Joshua 3x3,5mil
Matt Roy 4x7mil
Sean Walker 3x5,5mil

Opening Night:
(3rd line and 4th line play similar minutes, roll bottom 6)

Eklund - Granlund - Zetterlund
Couture - Celebrini - Smith (all centers, all get to center)
Joshua - Sturm - Graf
Musty (9 games) - Bystedt (9 games) - Kunin
Extras:
Kostin, Bordeleau, 4th line center FA

D pairs
Ferraro - Roy
Mukhamadullin - Walker
Thrun - Rutta/Emberson
Benning

Goalies
Blackwood
Vanecek

PP1: Eklund Celebrini Granlund Zetterlund Mukhamadullin
PP2: Couture Smith Joshua Musty Roy

PK1: Eklund Couture Walker Roy
PK2: Granlund Sturm Ferraro, Mukhamadullin/Rutta
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
9,808
1,437
We definitely need a top 4 d-man (or two) this summer, but I'd also like us to target Burns next summer. He'd be 40, in elite shape, and would be our best PP option. He's currently better than any RHD available this summer, particularly of the offensive variety. Two seasons from now he's probably a 18 minute offensive/PP specialist, but still worth considering.

Not a bad guy to have as a mentor for whoever our top 5 d-man pick is (unless BPA is a F), and we wouldn't have to pay a huge amount or sign him to massive term. I think he's also better than

Muk-Burns
Schaefer
-Demelo

Ferraro-Emberson

I expect Ferraro gets moved for futures at some point in the next 13 months, though we'll need another vet once he's moved anyway.
 

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,020
8,012
Canada
We definitely need a top 4 d-man (or two) this summer, but I'd also like us to target Burns next summer. He'd be 40, in elite shape, and would be our best PP option. He's currently better than any RHD available this summer, particularly of the offensive variety. Two seasons from now he's probably a 18 minute offensive/PP specialist, but still worth considering.

Not a bad guy to have as a mentor for whoever our top 5 d-man pick is (unless BPA is a F), and we wouldn't have to pay a huge amount or sign him to massive term. I think he's also better than

Muk-Burns
Schaefer
-Demelo

Ferraro-Emberson

I expect Ferraro gets moved for futures at some point in the next 13 months, though we'll need another vet once he's moved anyway.
Burns could be retired by then. Definitely shouldn't be playing him almost 20 mins/game.
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
5,699
9,571
Venice, California
We definitely need a top 4 d-man (or two) this summer, but I'd also like us to target Burns next summer. He'd be 40, in elite shape, and would be our best PP option. He's currently better than any RHD available this summer, particularly of the offensive variety. Two seasons from now he's probably a 18 minute offensive/PP specialist, but still worth considering.

Not a bad guy to have as a mentor for whoever our top 5 d-man pick is (unless BPA is a F), and we wouldn't have to pay a huge amount or sign him to massive term. I think he's also better than

Muk-Burns
Schaefer
-Demelo

Ferraro-Emberson

I expect Ferraro gets moved for futures at some point in the next 13 months, though we'll need another vet once he's moved anyway.

I think I’m ready to move on from ex-Sharks players. I don’t particularly want Burns or Karlsson back, I want this team to move forward now.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,322
6,339
The big fish I would move #14 (in a package) for is Martin Necas. I don't know what the Hurricanes plan to do with him. They have some cap flexibility but also need to replace half their defense. Might not hurt them to acquire a legit starter who isn't old and hurt all the time too.

Hurricanes don't operate like most other teams. Even though they're firmly in their contention window it seems like they are hesitant to move picks and prospects so they will likely prioritize replenishing what was sent to Pittsburgh in the Guentzel trade. Maybe 14 + 42 + Ferraro + one of Bystedt/Halttunen/Edstrom + one of Cagnoni/Lund/Havelid for Necas + Drury?
 
  • Like
Reactions: knu

Mafoofoo

Jawesome
Jul 3, 2010
18,908
5,069
Laguna Beach
jMoneybrah kind of described one of the big issues with it, but it's just problematic and I have anxiety disorder and I get frustrated fighting with it then I just don't want to deal with it so I avoid it. Last time I did it a few years ago I just could not get the game to play for the freaking life of me, either it wouldn't load, it'd give me the blackout error, or the game just wasn't even listed in the dumb app to open. Plus I have to remember to turn off the VPN on that device or my wife will get all upset that something else isn't working the way she expects, and if I setup of the VPN on my router obviously that causes other issues.

I did finally setup a pfsense router with a special rule that enabled VPN ONLY for traffic to ESPN/NHL but then AT&T changes something and my private router stopped working and I had to switch back to their crap router... you get the point, it's just a massive, massive, stupid, hassle.

I really appreciate everyone's help though :)

you can try slingtv as i believe they do carry nbc sports. youll have to just make sure your zip code gets nbc sports bay area
 

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,020
8,012
Canada
The big fish I would move #14 (in a package) for is Martin Necas. I don't know what the Hurricanes plan to do with him. They have some cap flexibility but also need to replace half their defense. Might not hurt them to acquire a legit starter who isn't old and hurt all the time too.

Hurricanes don't operate like most other teams. Even though they're firmly in their contention window it seems like they are hesitant to move picks and prospects so they will likely prioritize replenishing what was sent to Pittsburgh in the Guentzel trade. Maybe 14 + 42 + Ferraro + one of Bystedt/Halttunen/Edstrom + one of Cagnoni/Lund/Havelid for Necas + Drury?
I'd take out Bystedt/Edstrom/Haltunnen and Drury out of that. They're younger and bigger.

14+Ferraro+prospect for Necas is a start. Depending what the ask would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hodge

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,322
6,339
I'd take out Bystedt/Edstrom/Haltunnen and Drury out of that. They're younger and bigger.

14+Ferraro+prospect for Necas is a start. Depending what the ask would be.
I like the idea of Drury as a long term 3C behind Celebrini and Smith but I'd do that.

The argument against Necas would basically be "then why didn't we just keep Timo?" but Necas is coming off a not amazing year and should have a significantly lower acquisition cost than what we received for Timo, for the same reason he can also be signed to a much team friendlier deal (Troy Terry comp?), he's 2.5 years younger than Timo and is a right shot RW which we lack both on the roster and in the system.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,497
13,931
Folsom
The big fish I would move #14 (in a package) for is Martin Necas. I don't know what the Hurricanes plan to do with him. They have some cap flexibility but also need to replace half their defense. Might not hurt them to acquire a legit starter who isn't old and hurt all the time too.

Hurricanes don't operate like most other teams. Even though they're firmly in their contention window it seems like they are hesitant to move picks and prospects so they will likely prioritize replenishing what was sent to Pittsburgh in the Guentzel trade. Maybe 14 + 42 + Ferraro + one of Bystedt/Halttunen/Edstrom + one of Cagnoni/Lund/Havelid for Necas + Drury?
Hurricanes have 27 mil in cap dollars where they need six wingers and a center with new contracts on top of the three defensemen needing new contracts. Probably one more after they get rid of Kotkaniemi. If they buy him out, they'll get another 4 mil in cap savings to use towards this endeavor. I think they'll sign him long term and move others that they need to so they can make it fit.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,322
6,339
Hurricanes have 27 mil in cap dollars where they need six wingers and a center with new contracts on top of the three defensemen needing new contracts. Probably one more after they get rid of Kotkaniemi. If they buy him out, they'll get another 4 mil in cap savings to use towards this endeavor. I think they'll sign him long term and move others that they need to so they can make it fit.
They'll have some tough decisions to make. #1 priority has to be signing Jarvis long term. After that it might come down to Guentzel vs. Necas.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,497
13,931
Folsom
They'll have some tough decisions to make. #1 priority has to be signing Jarvis long term. After that it might come down to Guentzel vs. Necas.
I agree Jarvis is top priority. I think choosing Necas over Guentzel is the way to go for them since you're getting more value out of a long term deal through Necas than Guentzel. They're getting Morrow to probably slot into their 2nd pairing RHD and have the other top four spots under contract still so they can go cheap on the depth defensemen to backfill what they're losing with Chatfield, Deangelo, and Skjei. They can also buyout Kotkaniemi and Kuznetsov to save 6 mil where those guys are 4th liners playing occasional extra shifts. I think there's enough room to deal with it where they're only going to lose Guentzel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sharks_dynasty

TealManV

A man has said
Oct 12, 2011
707
26
California
I agree Jarvis is top priority. I think choosing Necas over Guentzel is the way to go for them since you're getting more value out of a long term deal through Necas than Guentzel. They're getting Morrow to probably slot into their 2nd pairing RHD and have the other top four spots under contract still so they can go cheap on the depth defensemen to backfill what they're losing with Chatfield, Deangelo, and Skjei. They can also buyout Kotkaniemi and Kuznetsov to save 6 mil where those guys are 4th liners playing occasional extra shifts. I think there's enough room to deal with it where they're only going to lose Guentzel.
Don’t forget about Pesce, TT, Martinook, and Noesen.

Drury is also an RFA.

The Canes are going to have a lot of big decisions to make this summer.
 

tahoesharksfan

Old-Timer
Apr 29, 2014
2,328
1,567
The Lake
My understanding is that Reno is still in "NBC Sports California" and Sharks territory, even after the VGK expansion. Thus, if Spectrum in Reno decided to stop carrying NBC Sports California, that's simply their choice and that won't change blackout rules.

It’s a little more confusing than that. We’re just on the California side up here and we do get the Sharks games on NBC…except when we play Las Vegas. Those games are broadcast on the NSN for some reason…
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,497
13,931
Folsom
Don’t forget about Pesce, TT, Martinook, and Noesen.

Drury is also an RFA.

The Canes are going to have a lot of big decisions to make this summer.
They do but I think a lot of them are probably already made. Pesce is likely gone because Morrow is coming in. The forwards could all come back but I think Teuvo will probably price himself out. Noesen probably should price himself out since he's never gotten a big contract and he's doing a lot to earn one but on most teams, he's still a 4th liner. I think they'll find a way to keep Martinook as long as he doesn't ask for more than like 3 mil. Drury will get re-signed. I think their tough decisions are going to be guys like Kotkaniemi and Kuznetsov. Kotkaniemi seems obvious but buyouts are always a tough pill to swallow especially given the circumstances around Kotkaniemi. Kuznetsov is doing alright with his fresh start but he can't be depended on and makes too much if you're not going to use him as a top nine winger replacement for anyone who bounces.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad