66-30-33
Registered User
Nothing lots of cheese can't fix.Yeah. Trade board is toilet filled with explosive diarrhea.
Nothing lots of cheese can't fix.Yeah. Trade board is toilet filled with explosive diarrhea.
If we got 14th OA I'd go big on acquiring a 2LD.I wouldn't be too stoked with landing Larsson, tbh. He's not horrible, but he's not exactly a great skater and I don't think he'd be more than a bottom pairing guy here. We need offensive blueliners first and foremost.
But, for the 14th OA, maaaaan... Especially if we pull the deal off before the draft, we could either keep the pick and land a stud prospect for a barren prospect cupboard, or we could flip that 14th OA for something significant to help now and moving forward, as it's a more universally accepted currency than an RFA goalie.
Same. A stud 2LD who can bring offense and grow/gel with Marino with the idea of those two taking over top pairing duties in another year--that's the dream.If we got 14th OA I'd go big on acquiring a 2LD.
I’m lactose intolerant, cheese will just make it a guarantee it ends that way on the toilet.Nothing lots of cheese can't fix.
Now who would be avail? seems most Dmen that are looked at are RD vs LD.Same. A stud 2LD who can bring offense and grow/gel with Marino with the idea of those two taking over top pairing duties in another year--that's the dream.
Not a clue.Now who would be avail? seems most Dmen that are looked at are RD vs LD.
Not a clue.
I think you can argue this is technically 1 fewer option for Murray, but I'd argue the alternate: this is one fewer option for starting goalies for a team that wants to win now. I don't think Crawford is what he once was, but he had a .917 save% this year and has 2 cups. He seemed like a great target for a team like Edmonton.
i think there maybe a better choice at center at 14oa imoIf we got 14th OA I'd go big on acquiring a 2LD.