Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,476
- 31,801
Yeah, O'Reilly sure does look like a greedy tyrant when we start inserting pictures of Horcoff and saying he's after a $5.5M+ paycheck, but where did this number even come from? When you strip an hyperbolic argument of hyperbole, there isn't much substance left.
There is clearly a huge difference between $3.5M and $5.5M, and the fact of the matter is, we don't know what O'Reilly is asking for. All we know is what has been offered: $3.5M. And I, like you, don't think it's unreasonable for O'Reilly to get paid more than that.
This is the most laughable thing I've heard in a long time. The same source that said the Avs were offering $3.5M was the one that said O'Reilly wanted $5M. How are you going to discount one without the other?